Chris Scanlon indicted following failed plea negotiations
Christopher James Scanlon has been indicted following failure to reach a plea agreement.
Scanlon (right) was arrested and charged with running an “unlicensed money transmitting business” back in 2023.
In short, through his companies PMA Media Group, Aurae Lifestyle, Nvayo Limited, Club Swan and AU Card LLC, Scanlon laundered money for scammers.
BehindMLM’s interest in Scanlon’s case stems from his companies providing financial services to BitClub Network, GSPartners and PLC Ultima – three since-collapsed fraudulent MLM investment schemes.
After Scanlon’s arrest we noted he was released on a $5 million secured release bond in August 2023. Since then though there have been no further updates, which is odd because it’s been a year and a half.
Following news of Nvayo Limited entering into “special administration” in the UK, I ran a check to see if there were any external Scanlon updates I might have missed.
I came across a second DOJ press-release on Scanlon, which when compared against the original 2023 release suggests Scanlon was caught trying to flee the country.
From the 2023 press-release;
Scanlon was arrested at Miami International Airport today and is expected to have his initial appearance in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on Friday.
And the 2024 release;
Scanlon was arrested at Miami International Airport on Oct. 10, 2024, and made his initial appearance in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on Oct. 11, 2024.
He was arraigned today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Lede Dunn Wettre in Newark federal court and pleaded not guilty.
I don’t know the specific arrest details but given Scanlon had relaxed travel restrictions on him, I take it he was travelling domestically prior to the second arrest.
Scanlon’s second arrest ties into his indictment, filed on October 11th, 2024. This created a new case number, which confusingly dates back to April 2023.
That is to say this second case docket has been updated continuously while the first case docket I was tracking appears to have been abandoned.
The good news is we haven’t missed much. Up until his October 2024 indictment filing, the docket entries mostly relate to relaxed release restrictions.
After Scanlon’s indictment things get a bit prickly. Scanlon has moved to dismiss the indictment, while the DOJ has requested complex case designation (essentially slowing down proceedings due to case complexity).
A decision on the DOJ’s complex case motion, filed on October 25th, 2024, remains pending.
The DOJ’s response to Scanlon’s motion to dismiss his indictment, filed on March 24th, provides insight into what occurred behind the scenes since 2023.
Since June 5, 2023, Scanlon’s bail conditions have been modified approximately seven times, at his request, to allow for travel and other less restrictive conditions.
Most recently, on December 27, 2024, with the Government’s consent, this Court modified Scanlon’s bail conditions by:
(1) removing GPS monitoring,
(2) allowing Scanlon to communicate with both domestic and foreign business based entities in which Scanlon has an interest in and for the purpose of terminating that interest; and
(3) removing the requirement that Scanlon needed approval to start a business, other than one involving banking or in the money transmitting industry.
For More Than Three Years, the Parties’ Attempted to Resolve the Matter and Mutually Agreed to Enter Continuances of the Speedy Trial Clock for 15 Months.
During the investigation, beginning in 2020, both before and after Scanlon was charged by complaint, and up until approximately mid-September 2024, the Government and Scanlon’s counsel (both current and former)1 met and conferred on numerous occasions, and engaged in serious plea negotiations at Scanlon’s request.
In September 2024, Scanlon’s New Counsel Ended Plea Negotiations and Refused to Agree to any Additional Continuances.
Since then the DOJ has provided Scanlon with “over 25,000 pages of discovery”.
In a nutshell, Scanlon argues his indictment should be dismissed because, as per the Speedy Trial Act, 70 days have passed from his indictment filing without trial.
The DOJ argues, among other things, that seventy days has not passed due to various events.
The 70-day clock has not run because periods of delay in this matter were excluded from the seventy-day calculation.
One example provided is Scanlon’s then new Counsel ghosting the DOJ for “more than a month” over language in a proposed protective order (pertaining to discovery).
And so that’s where we’re at. Rulings on the DOJ’s complex case motion and Scanlon’s motion to dismiss his indictment remain pending.
Must be a treasure trove of tax evasion in those BitClub Network, GSPartners and PLC Ultima transaction records.
Don’t be lazy bro. I was intrigued after I read your article so I READ THE WHOLE DOCKET.
I’m not an attorney but the documents read totally different. This guy wasn’t even charged with money laundering or fraud or theft.
If the DOJ had it, they would charge it. It’s conspiracy on 1960, strict liability or whatever so whether he knew it or not they could just go after him for nothing.
It looks like Scanlon asked to be indicted. Who does that? I’m just saying, not someone who has something to hide. And the 2nd press release looks like a bad copy and paste job bro. He wasn’t arrested a 2nd time in Miami. He had GPS monitoring and a curfew.
He’s asking for a speedy trial. Again not something you typically see when someone is even a little guilty.
To me this read more like the DOJ was trying to use him for the Bitclub case… DOJ even says it’s about Bitclub in the DOJ’s motion to continue.
Don’t sell yourself out for the clicks. Keep pushing out the good stuff only man.
I appreciate you’ve read one legal “docket” (I think you mean filing?) and are now an expert. Nonetheless…
The words “money laundering” and “theft” don’t appear in this article. That said, what do you think an unlicensed money transmitting business is used for?
Someone whose plea negotiations failed. Scanlon had to be indicted either way. He wasn’t upon his original arrest because of the prospect of a plea deal. If that’s off the table then we’re back to an indictment, which happened.
The DOJ’s press-release states Scanlon was arrested for a second time. An arrest typically happens prior to an arraignment.
No, Scanlon is asking the indictment be dismissed because, as per the Speedy Trial Act, 70 days passed from his indictment without trial.
Finally the BitClub case, with the exception of Russ Medlin, is at the sentencing stage. Scanlon doesn’t factor into sentencing.
Legal cases are complicated and even I miss things from time to time. This one at least for now, is pretty straight-forward though.
Best to not crystal ball it and read into proceedings what you want to read.
You’ve got me committed now man. Third paragraph in your article says “Scanlon laundered money for scammers”–DOJ would have charged him with money laundering if they believed he did this, which they didn’t.
Scanlon did demand a speedy jury trial in the brief response right after arraignment. The docket is all of the filings for a case. In this case, there are two dockets, 1st for criminal case and 2nd for indictment. I read all of these filings on courtlistener and pacer and I’ve started reading the Goettsche case now too.
Goettsche hasn’t pleaded to anything and hasn’t gone to trial so he isn’t at sentencing. Given he (and Medlin who is “at large”) appear to be the main guys, my hunch is they are trying to use Scanlon to get at Goettsche.
From what Scanlon’s attorneys have filed, Scanlon doesn’t have anything on Goettsche. Bigger question here is why do they even need help with the Goettsche case??
Common sense, a lot of things just don’t add up here. There have been two public calls from the DOJ for Bitclub victims and no one has come forward. (Ozedit: snip see below)
I guess this is the point where we all realise that this is Scanlon talking?
Bro,
You’re entitled to defend yourself. It doesn’t help you at all if you lash out.
Attacking the integrity of the DoJ is probably the worst thing you could do.
Don’t be a Jason Cardiff.
You think they don’t follow this site? Look at what happened to OneCoin where the judicial documents report what happened here first.
Be sensible
Again, irrespective of what Scanlon was specifically charged with, what do you think his role in the scams he processed stolen funds for was? What do you think the purpose of an unlicensed money transmitting business is?
No, he didn’t as per my previous reply. And anyway, with 25,000 pages of already produced discovery this case is likely to be designated complex at some point.
Please provide your DOJ credentials or admit you’re making stuff up. Making stuff up = spambin. First and last warning.
More likely Joby Weeks or associates. I get open corruption is the current political climate in the US but that doesn’t change BitClub Network being a Ponzi scheme or Joby’s role in it.
I have no interest in entertaining conspiracy theories. Short leash fellas, short leash.
My comment was censored. I’m out bro. Don’t bother posting this.
Thank you for confirming you were full of shit. Bye.