SEC shuts down Zhunrize, assets frozen
It’s the way in which Zhunrize pay out commissions to their affiliates which drags this opportunity into murky pyramid and potential Ponzi scheme territory.
Within the company themselves there’s no retail, as Zhunrize themselves only sell affiliate membership fees.
Put all of it together and, as an MLM business opportunity, Zhunrize leaves a lot to be desired.
–BehindMLM Zhunrize Review, December 2013
The SEC has shut down Zhunrize, revealing it to be a $105 million dollar Ponzi scheme in the process.
A civil injunction was filed in the Northern District court of Georgia against Zhunrize and CEO Jeff Pan.
The SEC allege
that Zhunrize, an Atlanta-based multi-level marketing company, and Pan have been operating a fraudulent pyramid scheme that has raised over $100 million from investors worldwide.
Almost a year ago BehindMLM reviewed Zhunrize and concluded as much, with the SEC’s injunction conclusion reading near identical to my own:
According to the Commission’s complaint, Zhunrize purports to be a legitimate multi-level marketing business by which members purchase online stores and then sell merchandise through them, while earning commissions on products purchased by their customers and through store sales to other members and hosting fees paid by those members.
In fact, the company is operating as a pyramid scheme because its commission structure is based on the continual recruitment of new members, with the most lucrative returns dependent on the downline recruitment of other members through store sales irrespective of any product sales.
To date, the company has taken in approximately $105 million from approximately 77,000 investors since 2012.
Zhunrize has close to 40,000 stores in Korea and 1,000 stores in China.
As usual, the problem is there is no significant retail activity taking place:
The Commission’s complaint also alleges that Zhunrize does not disclose, however, that to date substantially all of its revenue has comes from the sale of memberships (referred to as stores) and the corresponding monthly internet hosting fees associated with operating those stores, rather than the sale of products.
During two years of Zhunrize’s operations, beginning in July 2012 through late July 2014, virtually none of the $105 million in revenue received by Zhunrize was derived from product sales.
Zhunrize received a total of approximately $105.07 million in revenue from all sources during this period.
Of this, Zhunrize earned $103.66 million, or 98.66% of its revenue, from membership sales, the initial monthly hosting fee paid by a new member in connection with the purchase of a store, and the membership fee and initial hosting fee associated with an existing member’s purchase of an upgraded membership.
The amount of revenue earned from merchandise sales, which is calculated as the total amount of revenue less that earned from membership and initial hosting fees ($105.07 million minus $103.66 million), was only $1.41 million, or 1.34% of the total revenue received during the same period.
These revenue figures do not include the subsequent monthly hosting fees. If they were included, revenue from merchandise sales would be even a smaller percentage of total revenues.
Zhunrize has admitted that in 2014, the company has paid $340,000 in commissions to its members based on product sales and almost $51 million in commissions based on the sale of new stores (i.e. new memberships) and the hosting fees associated with those stores.
Pan (right) himself has testified that
the company currently derives 80-90% of its revenue from selling online stores and the monthly internet hosting fees for them, as opposed to actual products from these stores.
But in typical Ponzi scheme fashion,
a Zhunrize promotional video differentiates Zhunrize from other on-line multi-level marketing plans, claiming that Zhunrize has “sustainability.”
According to the video, the Zhunrize “model will sustain itself because we will have millions more customers than distributors.”
Later, the narrator in the video claims “we have the Vendor Relationships, the Logistics, the Payment Gateways to reach millions of new customers each month.”
And Ponzi players wonder why nobody takes their claims seriously. Once again, it is demonstrated that common-sense logic will always trump baseless marketing PR spin.
Thus, contrary to the representations to potential investors, Zhunrize is actually a fraudulent pyramid scheme.
The Commission’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleges that each defendant violated Sections 5(a), (c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 thereunder, and seeks against each defendant permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest and civil monetary penalties pursuant to Section 21A of the Exchange Act.
The Georgia court granted the SEC the requested injunction, and at the time of publication Zhunrize and Pan’s known assets are frozen.
E-commerce MLM’s pretending to have customers when infact most of your revenue is being derived from affiliate fees, you’ve been put on notice.
Dubli, who charge affiliates up to $12,000 to participate in their e-commerce scheme, might very well find themselves in Zhunrize’s position some point in the future.
Pan projected $90 million per month in product sales by December 2014. There is no basis for this projection given the company’s past performance.
Marketing spiels like the above should be intimately familiar to anyone currently promoting Dubli’s latest incarnation.
The SEC’s complaint charges Zunrize and Jeff Pan with three counts of fraud and the offering of unregistered securities.
A hearing to decide whether or not a preliminary injunction should be granted against Pan and Zhunrize is currently scheduled for October 6th.
Stay tuned…
Footnote: My thanks to the BehindMLM readers who sent in a heads up.
I went to their meeting back in March. It was filled with clueless old people who don’t know how to use the internet
They mentioned in the presentation that they can get better prices than Walmart, and you can also save time shopping at home and get better deals
Sounded too good to be true so I went home to click on one of the reps website to browse some products. I found lots of sites that sold the stuff for much cheaper than Zhunrize
That was a big red flag for me and I knew they were trying to sell everyone the highest package which was like $3000 and you were promised some bogus rev share deal
this is just like burnlounge selling ‘tools’ rather than products. lazy man jeff pan dint even take the time to inject some plastic water bottle product into his scheme.
guess he didn’t want to deal with the logistics of delivery etc.
Oh. My God!
I’m the $3000 premium member. How can i get back the money?
Please let me know how i can get the membership money back? Help me please!!
It’ll take you YEARS because SEC have to go to court, SEIZE all the money, then appoint a receiver to give it back. Much like what happened to Zeek Rewards. SEC shut their doors in August 2012 and first payment have yet to go out (very very soon now).
Very likely you will receive a letter from a Court appointed Receiver within a few months…..that is, so long as he/she has your correct address. Do what it says, wait, get on with your life.
Call other “premium members” and share information. Start a Google chat group where victims can discuss the case and share information. Call the SEC. Call the Receiver.
Why is it that its website is still running online
The case is too “fresh” for anyone to give any specific information, other than the information in the article itself.
Here’s the timeline for ZeekRewards (as an example):
August 17 2012: Shutdown by SEC + appointment of a temporary Receiver.
November 2012: Subpoenas sent to 1,200 top net winners
April 2013: General settlement letter sent to 16,000 net winners
May 2013: Claims process (for net losers) accepted by the court
June-September 2013: Possible to file claims.
January 2014: Most claims have been checked and verified.
September 2014: First interim distribution to 90,000 net losers.
The short version:
It took 9 months before people could file a claim, plus an additional 6 or 7 months before most claims had been verified, and a total of 2 years 1 month before anyone received any money. And ZeekRewards was a relatively “easy case”.
My suggestion:
“Share information” is usually a good idea, but it should be about factual information. The information you have now are the ones found in the article itself, plus “the case is too fresh”, plus “it will probably take some time, based on the ZeekRewards example”.
I can potentially give some additional information about potential sources (e.g. court documents), but I haven’t identified any sources yet (I haven’t looked for them).
I would have focused on writing some short notes about my membership, payment method etc., e.g. when did I pay, how did I pay, how much did I pay, my user name and password, direct sponsor’s user name, documentation for the transaction of the $3,000. I’m not familiar enough with Zhunrize to identify “what to do” more clearly than that.
If I had to guess I’d say Pan has partners offshore (in China).
Either they don’t care or haven’t gotten around to pulling the plug yet. Obivously Pan doesn’t have control of the Zhunrize website itself.
That said it is hosted in the US, so why the SEC haven’t taken control of it yet I’m not sure.
Some Zhunrize sheeple are spreading rumors that SEC let the company loose with just a warning, by citing the “still up” website as “evidence”.
“People will interpret the realities based on what they can SEE with their own eyes, combined with their own previous experiences”. The company may LOOK “perfectly alive and well” based on that method. 🙂
They probably have some ideas about how a shutdown works, e.g. that a shutdown immediately will be reflected in what they can SEE.
“IF IT LOOKS LIKE MONEY …”
The frozen NXpay e-wallets after the ZeekRewards shutdown generated some interesting descriptions. People could log into their accounts and SEE their monies, but they couldn’t withdraw anything or do any transactions, they could only LOOK AT a “balance”. It generated some interesting reactions when those balances suddenly disappeared. 🙂
People will by default look at their own understanding of something, e.g. “If it looks like money in a bank account it probably IS money in a bank account”. They will not analyse the differences between e-wallets and bank accounts.
What happens to the employees and the suppliers (vendor’s) of the company. Should they expect there payments on time?
Not if those running the show don’t have any offshore assets.
Employees and suppliers are unlikely get paid until the SEC case is sorted (what suppliers anyway? It was all a big fraud).
So as I know, 10/8 was the court day for zhunrize.
Everyone around me who’s in this company was claiming that everything will be okay, its just a big mistake etc. etc.
I cant find anything about court result, also is there really any chance zhunrize will be back in business?
“Back in business” ?? They never were IN business.