OneCoin twists arm of blockchain whitepaper author?
Reeling from the realization among affiliates that OneCoin currently doesn’t have blockchain, newly appointed CEO Pierre Arens has rushed out a press-release.
The May 10th publication seeks to reassure affiliates that he is “wholly satisfied” with OneCoin’s current SQL database “blockchain”.
Addressing why the need for an actual OneCoin blockchain then, Arens wrote;
In our fast-moving digital environment, you must look constantly to the future.
We therefore decided to prepare for that future with the introduction
of a next-generation blockchain capability that will support our growth and diversification well into the future.To do this, we engaged the services of a highly qualified specialist consultancy, who were asked to review our current needs and put in place a detailed plan for the introduction of this enhanced technology.
As part of this work, they prepared a White Paper summarising their findings and recommendations.
The blockchain specialist OneCoin hired was DX Markets’s Marcelo Garcia Casil. As CEO of the company, Casil authored the non-public OneCoin blockchain whitepaper.
Upon being questioned about the whitepaper by Bjorn Bjercke, a peer in the blockchain industry, Casil revealed his work ‘was not based on (OneCoin’s) existing IT‘ infrastructure.
This meant that, despite Arens representation above that the whitepaper represents some sort of “enhanced blockchain evolution” for the company, Casil’s proposals have nothing to do with OneCoin’s current SQL database setup.
When probed further about OneCoin’s current SQL setup, Casil admitted he “honestly (didn’t) know the answers to those questions”.
Now the story has changed.
Possibly having been threatened with legal action and who knows what else, Casil now claims he has in fact seen OneCoin’s “existing system”.
In a statement also published on May 10th, Casil wrote;
In recent days there has been publicity on the Internet suggesting that I have questioned the existing technological capabilities supporting the OneCoin cryptocurrency.
Any such suggestion is false and misrepresents my position.
I refute any allegations that I had not seen the existing system, nor have I questioned the competence of OneCoin’s present arrangements to satisfy the current needs of the cryptocurrency.
Considering Casil is the one who claimed he hadn’t seen OneCoin’s current system, refuting his own claim seems rather odd.
That and the tone of the announcement reads more like a hostage release statement than someone genuinely interested in clearing the air about a non-existent blockchain.
In any event, Casil’s statements directly contradict each other. So he was either lying when he was asked prior to OneCoin management twisting his arm, or he’s lying now (after OneCoin management got to him).
Take your pick.
And isn’t it funny how Pierre Arens can rush out a back-dated press-release about the whitepaper so quickly, yet not a peep about the Germany regulatory ban, Indian affiliate arrests, Hungarian crime taskforce or missing OneLife CEO Pablo Munoz?
Rome is burning, but god forbid someone reveals there is in fact no city.
Here is a version of OneCoin white paper which has been circulating on FB since yesterday. It’s quite a gem.
10 page PDF, sorry for bad quality: imgur.com/a/3rFZS
Haha, in the “white paper” there isn’t any technical description of the OneCoin blockchain technology.
Some interesting things caught my eye.
It says that in private blockchain mining is optional and could even be removed. “Mining” in this context simply means issuing new money by company’s fiat.
It also talks about anchoring Onecoin private blockchaing into another “system of high trust”, i.e well-known public blockchain so that everything is transparent and the company cannot modify past transactions, like delete over 30 day old transactions, ;-D.
According to the paper, they are Bitcoin and Ethereum, but no technical details how the anchoring is done.
They must have paid serious amounts of money to mr. Casil to risk his reputation for putting his name on something like this.
If this is “the” document, it’s an epic fail. One example:
I can hardly believe that somebody has been paid to write this (because it’s so true, and painful for this community).
what a tragedy now.
poor casil.
really fucked it up.
Another observation.
The paper describes the absence of proof-of-work algorithm (i.e solving work/energy-intesive cryptomath puzzle) as an asset for private blockchain because it allows network to grow in size while being cost-efficient.
Strangely, it is written later in the paper that “Onecoin supports a proof-of-work style mining and consensus algorithm”.
Also, here Ruja says that part of the value of OneCoin is based on minining difficulty that rests on energy and computational resources needed to solve the puzzles.
And, refering my post, why would the paper suggest abandoning “mining” if it is so essential to the coin value? Contradiction, it seems. 😉
@Onecoin insider – RE: “estimated to be in excess of…”
The moment blockchain.info hit 10,000,000 bitcoin wallets used they announced the milestone immediately. Why would Onecoin’s user base have to be “estimated” if it were blockchain based in the first place? (ps. It’s a rhetorical question)
…and why does onecoin.eu/tech still show “zero coins mined?” Are they waiting to upgrade the current and already “state-of-the-art(-KW)” blockchain to show mining in their “tech” page?
Furthermore, Onecoin is supposed to New “far More secure, advanced, faster, etc., than bitcoin…” So Why would they be anchoring to Bitcoin/ Ethereum based blockchain tech!
Lastly, RE: “bigger, stronger blockchain…” – bigger and stronger is defined by the hashing power of the network. In these terms, NO BLOCKCHAIN can be as big, string, secure, etc., than Bitcoin.
This just goes to show that Not one person in the entire organization, from the leaders down, have even a clue about cryptocurrency or blockchain technology.
@Semjon – In Ruja one and ONLY interview EVER with a cryptocurrency media group, Estonian Trader (February 2015) her response to the type of algorithm Onecoin uses (Q.#4) she claims “POW,” although it’s doubtful she even knew what that meant at the time.
She goes on to make a blithering fool of herself in the interview …hence why she boycotted the crypto media thereafter – quite telling in itself, actually.
SOURCE: estoniantrader.com/onecoin-scam/
Of course he was bought off and besides he likes living to spend the money.
After careful analysis it’s obvious, this document has been written by a troll.
Epic bullshit for “OneCoin, the Bitcoin killer”:
So this means that the author, Marcelo Garcia Casil, Co-Founder & CEO of DXMarkets Pre Ltd. is a troll disguised as a troll. He has accepted dirty money with the aim to make OneCoin Ltd and its CEO Pierre Arens look ridiculous.
Within one week we’ll see a new Official Statement from Pierre Arens who will deny categorically that this is the real OneCoin whitepaper.
Tim, very telling. 🙂 In the paper they say that their current IT-infrastructure is on equivalent of AWS 2xlarge instance type cloud. I’m not an expert but it sounds awfully puny for POW-stuff for millions of users and billions of coins.
Perhaps someone could calculate how much time it would take to mine even 1 BTC with such hardware.
Btw. If the new OneCoin is going to be reliant on or anchored to Bitcoin and Ethereum, their current Bitcoin antagonism and mocking has to stop.
Perhaps they even change their slogans to something like “OneCoin – powered by Bitcoin!”, “OneCoin – anchoring trust to Bitcoin!” 😉
So this whitepaper is trying to explain why onecoin wants full access to manipulate their “blockchain” data and access.
Only one huge problem – where is any of this explaining the value or how value of the coin is being created?
Processing millions of worthless transactions means nothing.
It’s basically someone got paid to write a justification for SQL database Ponzi points (sorry, “private blockchain”).
Looks like the Bulgarian mafia have Marcelo Garcia Casil caught by the balls. He must be terrified of the potential consequences of crossing them.
I got a note from someone claiming to have been at a conference that Ruja spoke at recently regarding crypto-currency, and at the end of her speech there was no applause. Can anyone confirm if this is true?
I received this info from someone out of the blue that I have no clue who they are. I can imagine there might have been a little applause, but to have none, zero, nil, nada doesn’t sound right.
Pierre Arens at OneLife event in Japan. from fb kari Wahlroos
This fkng Charlatan starts with a prayer for the victims of Manchester.
youtube.com/watch?v=q3CbUHmNuQc&feature=youtu.be
It says a lot about the character of a person when he is trying to win sympathy from a crowd over such a disaster. Just to appear as a sincere and caring human being, when the truth is they don’t give a shit about other people.
The only thing they care about is scamming money from victims and keeping up their image of excellent business people.
Apparently mr. Arens has such little knowledge of so-called financial revolution that he has to fill his little time on stage with fake sympathy and a minute of silence. What a pitiful and sickening bunch of low lifes!
What an unsubstantial presentation by Pierre -the new CEO. Now the projected number of merchants by year end has reduced from 1 million to 500k.
i guess there should be 250k by now but nowhere near that figure and all low level transactions -apart from buying tickets to the jamborees.
What are the regulators doing IN japan where distributors have been taking bags of money to stations to buy codes–welcome to the new kamikazes.
DealShitter has an astonishing 10 800 open deals. Even if they all were from different merchants, there would be only 10 800 merchants present.
But of course it gets uglier, here’s a link to a post in the MuroBBS forum:
DealShitter deals
This post contains links to 13 separate DealShitter accounts that together have inserted over 10% of all open deals in DealShitter.
Let that sink in: THIRTEEN sellers are responsible of over 10% of the deals.
And then it’s even worse than that: four accounts out of the thirteen belong to SAME SELLER (same name, same address). He is alone holding 2.8% of all open deals in DealShitter. One seller.
They have loooooooooong way to go for the 500 000 merchants. No wonder they dropped the million target.