Nui launches CompChain with pyramid recruitment & COCO altcoin
Another day, another excuse to ram crypto buzzwords down the throats of the MLM community.
Why Compchain?
Compchain is changing the scope of networking as we know it.
Built on immutable blockchain technology, Compchain allows you to lock in your network for life, and tap into new products and opportunities as they’re added to the platform.
The basic concept behind Nui’s CompChain is your downline is tracked on a blockchain, as opposed to a regular database.
For Nui affiliates there’s no discernible difference. CompChain is a unilevel team downline, same as any other MLM company.
But y’know… blockchain.
Nui’s argument for a blockchain based downline goes like this;
Compchain is the world’s first blockchain created specifically for networking.
It puts the power of your personal network back in YOUR hands.
Compchain provides a safe, secure service that stores and protects your network, forever.
The implication is that other MLM companies manipulate and steal downlines at whim.
In CompChain that’s supposedly not possible, hence “putting the power back in your hands”.
My problem with this is CompChain is no different to how an MLM company is supposed to work.
If you’re in an MLM company and your downline is stolen, you’re in a shitty MLM company run by shitty people.
CompChain is run by Nui. Their back-end business model sees them hoping to get other MLM companies to use CompChain for downline management\, as opposed to existing platforms.
What I haven’t seen addressed anywhere is what happens if an MLM company asks Nui to fork a CompChain downline to manipulate it?
Also if Nui goes under, bye-bye to the MLM companies using CompChain?
Nui running managing other MLM company downlines sounds like a single point of failure.
With other platforms you buy the platform and can run it locally. You won’t get official updates and support if the providing company goes under but at least it’ll run.
A third-party developer can always be brought in to keep the system running and address issues if need be.
As far as I know CompChain isn’t open-source and they’re running CompChain on their own servers.
The traditional platform equivalent is if you ran your MLM company on a hosted third-party platform, and the hosting company went out of business.
Oh, and there’s also this buried in CompChain’s Terms and Conditions;
CompChain reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to terminate your access to the Site and the related services or any portion thereof at any time, without notice.
How is this different to any other MLM company again?
In an effort to demonstrate use-case for CompChain, Nui is launching their own downline on it.
This appears to be separate to the Nui downline, although Nui affiliates are obviously being encouraged to sign up.
Attached to CompChain is the CompCoin (COCO) altcoin Nui have created.
CompCoin is not publicly tradeable and for now exists only within Nui and CompChain.
Till then, COCO are essentially internal currency points.
The idea behind Nui’s CompChain downline is that people sign up, get organized into a unilevel team and then products are launched to sell to the downline.
Two things immediately come to mind;
- Why launch CompChain if there aren’t any products yet?
- Selling to affiliates in CompChain (everyone is an affiliate) isn’t retail sales, which any legitimate MLM company needs.
Without any products or services there’s nothing to purchase or sell, so you’re probably wondering what exactly Nui have launched.
Currently all you can do in CompChain is get invited by an existing affiliate.
Each new CompChain affiliate that signs up receives $3 in CompCoin.
I couldn’t find the current internal value of CompCoin anywhere on Nui’s website or that of CompChain.
When an existing CompChain affiliate recruits a new affiliate, they have to hand over $1 worth of COCO.
Commissions on recruitment of CompChain affiliates are paid in COCO as follows:
- 25 cents worth of COCO per affiliate recruited down ten unilevel team levels
- $15 worth of COCO if three personally recruited affiliates complete CompChain KYC verification
- $30 worth of COCO if three affiliates recruited by three personally recruited affiliates each complete CompChain KYC verification (nine second level affiliates)
COCO is generated by Nui on demand at little to no cost.
There’s nothing about an internal exchange on the CompChain website, without which COCO has no value at all (even if there’s an assigned internal value).
The problem for Nui is that if there is or ever is an internal CompChain exchange, they’re running a pyramid scheme.
An internal exchange assigns an actual value to COCO, which means CompChain affiliates can liquidate it into real money (typically USD or another cryptocurrency).
COCO can be mined (mining is trivial for any new altcoin), but otherwise the only way to acquire it is through CompChain recruitment.
COCO mining has nothing to do with the CompChain MLM opportunity, which as it stands only pays on recruitment.
There’s also securities law at play.
If Nui is representing COCO is worth USD, which they are when they talk about paying $1 worth of COCO per affiliate recruited or paying affiliates $15/$30 worth of COCO, that is the primary incentive to recruit.
That incentive, that COCO is worth USD and by extension will be worth more USD in the future, is potentially a securities offering – even if COCO is not being directly invested in (which it very well might be if CompChain runs an internal exchange).
I can’t see CompChain affiliates acquiring COCO without a liquidation route, so I’m almost certain there’s an internal exchange.
Whether CompChain affiliates are able to access it or not is another matter.
Further to potential securities law violations, by giving COCO out for free and not charging affiliate membership fees, the question of what will fund COCO liquidation is important.
If it’s through an internal exchange, that will see CompChain affiliates pay other affiliates looking to withdraw, based on whatever internal COCO value Nui has set.
This ties into the representation (implied or otherwise) that COCO will increase in value – even if it’s directly publicly stated.
Nui for their part has to be careful, lest the Texas Securities Board take them to task again.
Not really sure how this is going to play out.
If Nui’s CompChain pyramid recruitment and potential securities fraud flies under the radar, such that they’re able to eventually push some product/service to affiliates, then you have 100% internal consumption as an issue.
And if there provisions for retail customers in CompChain (none are mentioned that I can see), are genuine retail customers going to waste their time signing up for blockchain, KYC, acquiring COCO, blahblahblah?
Affiliates will jump through hoops on the promise of commissions. Retail customers aren’t going to bother.
And again that’s only if there’s provision for retail customer selling in CompChain, of which I’ve seen no evidence of or even reference to.
TL;DR? CompChain is the blockchain solution to downline management that nobody asked for or needs.
Nui is promoting CompChain via pyramid recruitment, attached to an altcoin they’ve created.
Given the usual “to the moon!” MLM crypto nonsense we see, this is potentially another securities fraud violation in the making.
Compchain is the stupidest idea Nui has generated to date but I have faith they can surpass it.
A selling point is that since your downline is in a blockchain you can move it to different companies/opportunities. I can see how moving them into a new MLM company ~could~ work, you just get your organization to manually join the new company honoring the line of sponsorship but once in getting them out is harder.
Typically moving from one MLM to another is a rather contentious situation. It’s generally accepted that you can prospect your direct referrals to join you but past that you open yourself to allegations of cross recruiting and could jeopardize any residual income you were expecting from the company your moving from.
One point, there are expected to be products but the wont come from Nui. A compchain member can peddle their wears through the lines of sponsorship, giving their purchasers upline a cut of the sales price. Or the seller could step outside the chain, sell directly to the purchaser and keep 100% of the sales price. You know, either or.
I havn’t been following compchain too closely, it’s very hard to take something so stupid seriously. But recently they seem to be saying that membership is free for Nui members where as “blocks” and “nodes” were rather pricey last fall.
I have no idea how that is going to play out but I rather doubt people who paid their way in last fall should expect a refund.
In somewhat related news the “Electronic Vault” is soon to launch. I’m waiting for them to get their story straight on this before commenting but lets just say they’re talking about starting their own bank.
Yea, Compchain’s reign as the stupidest Nui related idea might be a short one.
Why as an independent MLM company owner would you use CompChain though?
One disagreement with Nui and you no longer have an affiliate database. Or they could cut you off for any reason really, as per CompChain’s T&C.
Compchain is marketed as an affiliate resource, a “build your downline once and “own” it forever” sort of deal.
Why any other MLM company would choose to honor Compchain is never addressed in the sales pitch, ’cause blockchain be like magic.
On a related note Darren Olayan was recently appointed the CEO of Appliqate Inc. (OTC:APQT). APQT has announced that it will soon be changing it’s name to OnliChain.
OnliChain either is CompChain or at least an application thereof.
This is a rehash of last year’s deal with Protect Pharmaceuticals (OTC:PRTT) which was officially dissolved. My guess is that it was due to exorbitant claims in press releases ($250 million in funding, $40 million investment in Olayan’s International Membership Data, LLC).
APQT is a different shell company than PRTT but OnliChain links the two. Given that a few of APQT’s public filings have gone unpublic recently I’d venture a guess that it was to hide the name Wajed Roger Salem.
Salem (or Salam, he uses both) is interesting, he cut his teeth shilling Russ Whitney Sr.’s real estate seminar scams and went on to being a presenter for Russ Whitney JR.’s MOBE scam.
And now his name is tied to OnliChain and Nui’s Darren Olayan. One hell of a pedigree.
Ugh. When they have to make “nothing to do with us *winkwink*” shell companies for every component of the business you know it’s only a matter of time…
Appliqate Inc. has a steaming pile of a press release:
globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/03/26/1773463/0/en/Appliqate-Inc-OTC-APQT-Acquires-Stake-in-NUI-Social.html
Appliqate Affiliates? Is OnliCoin joining the Kala/CoCo stable?
Are people dumb enough to follow Darren there?
100,000,000 shares of APQT being set aside for an Employee Stock Option Program for Appliqate Affiliates?
Do they sell APQT stock in Texas?
$500 worth of Kala, what’s that, like 500,000?
Appliqate website has an Alexa ranking of 8.1 million. This is another company nobody outside of Nui has ever heard of.
It’s a shell company with a negative cashflow and almost no stock value until mid last December.
Appliqate started on April 29, 2015 as a text message marketing firm but never seemed to make it as a going concern (some marketers).
All of the SEC filings are from that version of the company. The last of which was from July 2018 and reported a net income of $1,204.45.
Since then the shell of the company appears to have changed hands and it’s been announced that the company’s name will be changed to OnliChain.
When Darren et al. get around to making an SEC filing it will be amusing reading. I’ll bet 50 Kala that the financials will be unaudited.
A couple of points of clarification.
Nui and Darren do not own or have control CompChain, they have been given permission to use it by its real owner. But CompChain can be used by anyone. Dig deeper.
Salam is out as is everyone else that they had dragging along behind them, listening to their promises. It is Darren, Una, and Marcus. Dig deeper into who holds the APQT stock and then who owns the companies that own that stock. This is a lot deeper, keep digging.
They have screwed over a lot of companies to get to this point and even more investors. Look at the people that are mining Darren’s crap. They are still signing people up, how many are getting currency from the mining?
Even better; go to the office or try and contact any of the employees. Rumor is they were evicted by the Utah County Sherriff for non-payment on their lease, and there are only three employees besides Darren left.
Or you could just spill the beans? Seems a bit of a trivial point to get all Sherlock Holmes about.
Because people need to see the facts as they are, without commentary or personal bias.
But look at who owns the companies, and what companies own the majority of the stock in APQT. There are some very interesting people and pasts there. Misconduct, felon convictions, fraud, SEC violations, the list goes on.
A good investigative reporter could have a field day with this entire mess.
But Darren, Nui, Appliqate, none of them own Compchain and anyone can contact the owners at Robin Sage and become an affiliate, just like they did. Their link is an affiliate link.
compchain.io/?inv=FACTHBTLJU