Lyoness pyramid judgment discussion disappearing across Europe?
Word on the grapevine is critical discussion of Lyoness in several European countries has recently disappeared.
It began with the removal of a discussion thread on Radar, one of the largest consumer information forums in the Netherlands.
The Lyoness discussion thread on Radar had grown to about 800 to 1000 posts before it was deleted without warning or explanation.
One BehindMLM reader reached out for an explanation and was told;
Their webteam claims that the moderators have removed the entry due to it containing outdated information.
But given that half of the forum consists of topics both started and ended in the early 2000s, and about companies/rackets that no longer exist (sometimes over a decade), this is obviously bullshit.
Meanwhile in Germany the Verbraucherrunde consumer protection forum, which contained “thousands of critical posts on Lyoness”, has gone offline.
Although general in nature, Lyoness was the primary topic discussed on the forum. If one punches “verbraucherrunde” into Google for example, the sole suggestion that comes up is “verbraucherrunde lyoness”.
Why Verbaucherrunde shut down is unclear.
Meanwhile on Wikipedia, “LyonessGroup” has been trying to censor information pertaining to recent court judgement against Lyoness.
Under the guise of removing news of judgments due to “missing citation of sources”, LyonessGroup deleted reference to recent judgments against it in Austria and Switzerland.
LyonessGroup’s edits were quickly reverted, as the judgment numbers were included in the original updates.
The latest updates from Wikipedia user “Der Investigator” state;
The Bezirksgericht (District Court) of Innsbruck, Austria, has decided on July 14, 2017 in its judgment 26 C 609/16k – 17 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme within the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian Law against unfair competition).
The verdict of the Bezirksgericht, Innsbruck, was rendered based on legal action taken by a Japanese native woman residing in Austria with no professional income.
The Bezirksgericht (District Court) of Feldkirch, Austria, has decided on June 28, 2017 its its judgment 8 C631/16m – 6 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme within the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian Law against unfair competition).
The verdict of the Bezirksgericht, Feldkirch, was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian private individual, who at the time of becoming a Lyoness member, was unemployed.
The Bezirksgericht (District Court) of Innsbruck, Austria, has decided on July 12, 2017 its judgement 26C 610/16g-15 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme within the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian Law against unfair competition).
The verdict of the Bezirksgericht, Innsbruck, was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian insurance broker.
This isn’t the first time Lyoness has been caught out vandalizing their Wikipedia page. Lyoness and their affiliates have been trying to scrub the page of factual reporting of Lyoness’ regulatory issues since 2013.
Sounds like a gag order in progress. Doesn’t Europeans have some sort of SLAPP law?
Europe’s current laws favor criminals over public interest.
I remember a few years back reading about some new bizzaro law where you can commit crime, wait a few years and then demand any mention of it removed from search results.
Guess they’ll have to discuss it OUTSIDE of Europe then.
Now that you mention it, I seem to recall that French decision “right to be forgotten” or something like that, and even Google got slapped for some search results.
To Oz only judge can say if someone is criminal or not. Criminals are ugly people they smell bad and they like violant actions.
i hate criminals thank god.. police is nowdays more power over criminals. i think its not right to use word as criminal here coz criminals are some uneducated trouble makers. loynness is more likely well educated business mens andvwomrns.
Uh, I wasn’t referring to Lyoness or anyone in it with that comment. Obvious is obvious?
Not true. The judge just sets the sentence for the crime committed not saying who is a criminal. It is the police who determine who is a criminal when they charge someone with a crime.
The prosecutor prosecutes the crime, the defense attorney tries to get their client off, that is if it gets to court. Most criminals do a plea deal. No judge required.
If you want to get punished for crime then you get it. In this world you dont need to accept nothing!!
Get the lawer tell him if he save you he will be famous and more clients he will get it everything is just business nothing personally… people accepting things bybthemselfes. But we have humen rights!! So lets use out rights more
I’m thinking about joining but if what is written is true, then I will not join. Can you refer to the original source of this information regarding the judgement because that would increase the reliability of what has been written.
Thanks
Sure. Take the judgment numbers to The Bezirksgericht (District Court) of Feldkirch, Austria. It’s right there in the article.
Is there an online link or other references that you can provide to make up the reliability?
As I’m not living in Austria i can not do what you suggested but im really interested in the information.
Thanks
No. Otherwise I would have linked to it/quoted it.
We’re quite spoilt in the US when it comes to following lawsuits!
So if you’re in the US, how could you access this judgement if it doesn’t exist anywhere on the internet?
Never claimed I did. The source is linked in the article.
I don’t speak German in any event, so a lengthy German judgment would be rather useless to me.
Then you have two choices.
a) You can believe Oz (who doesn’t want your money) and not join.
or
b) You can believe Lyoness (which does want your money) and join.
Simple, really.