GSPartners @ BehindMLM

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), has urged the US House Committee on Financial Services not to weaken state securities regulators. Several MLM related fraud cases, initiated by state regulators in the US, are cited in support. NASAA is made up of US state regulators, as well as their equivalents in the District of [Continue reading…]

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), has cited thirteen GSPartners enforcement actions as examples of US state regulators “fighting fraud”.

Following a complaint asserting Apertum Foundation’s APTM token isn’t MiCA compliant, BitMart has restricted trading activity in Lithuania.

GSB has re-engaged settlement negotiations over GSPartners allegations made by the Texas State Securities Board (TSSB).

As per a July 31st order, the Texas State Securities Board has opted to set aside its Apertum Foundation emergency order. The order, issued on March 20th, pertains to ongoing alleged securities fraud. In addition to Apertum Foundation, TSSB’s order named Josip Heit, Dirc Zahlmann, Bruce Innes Wylde Hughes and Dennis Christopher Loos as respondents.

Apertum Foundation has been denied a preliminary injunction by Frankfurt’s Main Regional Court. The injunction was requested as part of preliminary proceedings against BE Conflict Management (BEKM), following a cease and desist earlier this year.

Metamask has flagged DAO1’s website domain as “potentially deceptive”. Metamask, a US-based software company, markets itself as the “leading crypto wallet platform”. Consumers can connect their Metamask wallets to participate in DAO1’s unregistered investment scheme. In or around early to mid July, Metamask began flagging DAO1’s website as “might be harmful”.

The Texas State Securities Board’s Billionico and Auratus emergency fraud order has been dismissed.

In order to avoid publishing multiple articles with respect to changing GSB & Apertum Texas fraud case scheduling, this article will be updated with the latest on both proceedings.

Although it’s obvious who created, owns and runs DAO1, central to marketing is the false narrative that DAO1 is decentralized. Rather than just be honest and transparent, DAO1’s owners and executives are presented as “advisors”: While that marketing ruse holds tight, DAO1 has somewhat dropped the decentralized investment ruse by launching DAO1 Lite.