Top US BitConnect investor Glenn Arcaro threatens to sue critic
A week before it collapsed, Glenn Arcaro started scrubbing his social media profiles of any mention of BitConnect.
Arcaro also shut down his Future Money website, which was instrumental in promoting BitConnect and recruiting new investors.
After doing so Arcaro went into hiding and has not been seen or heard from in public since. He is believed to be hiding out somewhere in Europe.
BitConnect’s collapse meanwhile has resulted in a collapse of about $2.4 billion in market value, with real-world victim losses running into at least hundreds of millions of dollars.
Rather than face his victims, Arcaro is instead threatening those calling him out with legal action.
About a week ago BehindMLM ran a story covering a $1000 bounty offered for Glenn Arcaro’s and fellow BitConnect shill CryptoNick’s” whereabouts.
The bounty was offered by Badisse David Mehmet (right), who publicized the offer through his YouTube channel.
On January 24th Arcaro responded by threatening Mehmet with legal action.
As per the letter above, titled “Your social media posts about our client, Glenn Arcaro”, Arcaro is demanding Mehmet
cease and desist from disparaging and defaming Mr. Arcaro regarding BitConnect.
In your YouTube account, you posted multiple videos and comments disparaging and defaming Mr. Arcaro, accusing him of participating in the so-called BitConnect fraud or scam, portraying him as a “thief”.
You repeatedly claim that he is an officer, director, and shareholder of BitConnect.
However, Mr. Arcaro previously advised you that he never such a position [sic] or role in BitConnect.
Naturally anyone remotely familiar with BitConnect will point to Arcacro’s listing as a Director in a UK shell company related to BitConnect.
Don’t worry though, Arcaro’s lawyers have that covered.
We are in the process of correcting his role with the United Kingdom’s Companies House as he never gave BitConnect permission to list him in such roles nor has he ever acted in such capacities.
The shell company in question is BitConnect International PLC, which was incorporated last September.
On January 16th Arcaro’s bogus UK address was struck from the document as a forgery (scams providing fake addresses in their UK incorporation documents is the norm), however Arcaro’s position as a Director still stands.
As per a Confirmation Statement filed October 3rd, 2017, Arcaro retains 181,818 shares in BitConnect International PLC.
Funny how Arcaro, who is listed as a Director along with several other top BitConnect investors from around the world, didn’t have a problem appearing as a BitConnect Director until the Ponzi scheme collapsed.
Arcaro’s letter goes on to cite Mehmet as the author of three articles on three separate blogs, one of which is our own BehindMLM article covering Mehmet’s $1000 bounty.
And despite Glenn Arcaro making millions through BitConnect, a Ponzi scheme that defrauded thousands of investors, his lawyers insist this isn’t a crime.
Mr. Arcaro, however, has not
(i) engaged in any criminal conduct;
(ii) been criminally charged, and
(iii) ever held a position of ownership in BitConnect.
Thus, your websites contains false and libelous information and statements about Mr. Arcaro.
While I can’t personally attest to what Mehmet might have published elsewhere, in our two articles we here at BehindMLM never actually referred to Arcaro as a criminal.
In any event, profiting from Ponzi schemes is a crime in the US and those who do so are subject to potential clawback litigation.
So technically even if Mehmet asserted Arcaro is a criminal, based on his profiting in the BitConnect Ponzi scheme, he’s not wrong. The argument that no criminal charges have been brought doesn’t hold up because a Ponzi scheme is such regardless.
Tellingly, Arcaro’s lawyers don’t dispute he made millions through BitConnect.
Mehmet’s response to Arcaro’s cease and desist is that it’s “absolutely ridiculous”.
Mehmet maintains Arcaro is a Director of BitConnect and reiterates the address forgery (not Arcaro being a Director) is only based on Arcaro’s claim it is so.
Regarding his comments about Arcaro, Mehmet claims they are protected by absolute privilege.
I am covered by a defense of truth, absolute privilage [sic] because my video posts were investigations in the preparations of filing a lawsuit against Glenn Arcaro and to warn others of his involvement with the illegal activities of Bitconnect.
Yesterday a class-action lawsuit was filed by BitConnect victims against the company, Glenn Arcaro and several other top promoters.
In a January 25th video titled “BitConnect Director Glenn Arcaro threatens to sue me”, Mehmet closes with a warning to Arcaro and his attorneys;
I was sued before by an attorney for defamation and I won, okay?
And I got sanctions against him. And my counter-claims survived.
You file a frivolous defamation claim against me (and) I’m gonna counter-sue. And I’m going to ask for sanctions against (the) attorney as well.
So heed that warning.
Personally I can’t see Arcaro following through with threats of legal action.
In addition to now having to deal with the class-action lawsuit, Arcaro is likely on the run from US authorities and doing everything to stay off the radar.
I mean let’s face it, unwanted attention is what this cease and desist is really about anyway.
Shame though. Always amusing to watch Ponzi shills file lawsuits and lose over and over again in court.
Even onecoin couldn’t win one of these lol.
uh, it seems the companies house in the UK registers companies and directors ‘on good faith’ without checking for any proof.
so literally, anyone can name anybody and any address and companies house will register it?
this bitconnect investor called up companies house UK and recorded the conversation about the registration and directors of bitconnect:
youtube.com/watch?v=zTL1Fx_EeFU
no wonder half the world’s scammers run to get registered at companies house UK and then show off about operating from a ‘respectable’ jurisdiction like the UK.
I don’t know the specifics but it seems there’s very little if any verification on their part.
Scammers have been using random addresses and names to register UK corporations for years. They only do it for the certificate, which gullible idiots fall for as a sign of legitimacy.
Why not? The purpose of Companies House is to incorporate companies, not bust scams.
This is the UK, not India’s licence raj, and anyone is allowed to incorporate a company even if they’re a cleaning lady or a non-profit sports club. Hence it’s cheap and it’s not Companies House’ job to demand utility bills or review the legitimacy of a business model.
If anyone thinks that having a UK Companies House number confers legitimacy, they have invented this idea out of whole cloth.
I saw alot of this guys video’s last night. Hes really putting up a good fight.
Although in one he takes a swipe at the “haters” who tried to warn people it was a ponzi stating that not one person could provide solid evidence it was a ponzi (hes very defniitive in this statement) ….. until it collapsed.
This is a variation of trying to get people to prove a negative.
If Glenn Arcaro insists BitConnect isn’t a Ponzi by virtue of it generating external ROI revenue, the onus is on him to provide evidence they generate external ROI revenue.
In this video, youtube.com/watch?v=N8SlpGghTJU it appears that Mehmet’s name was originally listed as one of the individual plaintiffs in the class action, as well as someone named Eric Nordyke.
Mehmet claims to have opted out of the class action in order to tailgate his own lawsuit if he decides to. He claims to be owed $142,000
Just once I wish these blowhards would actually do it instead of threatening to do it. All talk and no walk.
in a recent youtube video mehmet claims to have located glenn arcaro:
youtube.com/watch?v=0LNhUnRrUZw
Ruhroh!
Hong Kong, Bali, Georgia (country), Maldives, Colombia… on the run and spending that stolen Ponzi money like a boss.
Arcaro and his girlfriend’s Instagram accounts have also been deleted sometime over the last few days.
Can’t say I agree with the second half of the video though.
Due-diligence would require BitConnect to provide evidence of a trading bot generating revenue and that revenue being used to pay affiliates a ROI.
There’s no escaping BitConnect affiliates invested without proof of the trading bot existing being provided.
Then Mehmet goes on to parrot USI-Tech management’s claims about “hiring SEC lawyers” and reopening in the US? Uh… what?
Badisse David Mehmet goes on a nice little rant making excuses as to why he bit on the BCC scam.
After all, he claims he was able to turn $2,300 into $70,000 in 6 months. Hell, if it’s that easy, he should be at over $60 billion in another two years without joining these ponzis.
I wonder if he realizes he just happened to hit some things just at the right time. He paid attention and he got a little lucky. As it pertains to BCC, common sense should have told him that you can’t build an MLM out of promising high ROI in a volatile industry.
And you really just have to LOL at using USI-Tech as an example of what a legitimate company should do in response to regulatory action. But he emphasizes that he’s not saying they are legit.
Apparently, he hasn’t paid much attention to the USI-Tech story as it unfolded.
But then again, warnings from sites like BMLM are just baseless in his eyes, lol.
here is a great video on the gangs of thieves in bitconnect.
Bitconnect gang of thieves identified: youtube.com/watch?v=hTZzEct0w_w