Jason and Eunjung Cardiff facing incarceration over contempt
Redwood Scientific Technologies defendants Jason and Eunjung Cardiff, along with third-party Jacques Poujade, have been ordered to appear before court on July 30th.
At the hearing they’ll be required to explain continued failure to comply with a previously granted restraining order – failing which they face potential incarceration.
Redwood Scientific Technologies, parent company of RengaLife, was sued by the FTC late last year.
The FTC alleges that through Redwood Scientific Technologies, owners Jason and Eunjung Cardiff “bilked consumers out of millions of dollars”.
On June 17th the FTC filed a show cause motion. The motion, if granted, would require Jason and Eunjung Cardiff, and Jacques Poujade, to explain to the court why they shouldn’t be held in contempt.
The FTC asserts the Cardiffs and Poujade ‘have violated provisions in the Court’s Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction‘.
Specifically, the FTC alleges the Cardiffs
have failed to report assets and entities of which they were directors, officers, and owners.
They have failed to provide a full accounting of all assets and accounts outside of the United States, have failed to provide documents and records held by third parties outside the United States, and have failed to repatriate and deliver to the Receiver all documents and assets located in foreign countries.
The Cardiffs have dissipated domestic or foreign assets, and hindered the repatriation of assets.
They have failed to provide the FTC and Receiver with required information about business entities they operated or controlled.
They have failed to deliver assets to the Receiver.
They have failed to provide to the Receiver a list of all assets and accounts of the Receivership entities and the Cardiffs held in other names.
They have interfered with the Receiver’s efforts to take possession of assets or documents subject to the receivership, and disposed of assets belonging to the Receivership and the Cardiffs.
And they have failed to comply with expedited discovery.
According to the FTC, third-party Jacques Poujade has assisted the Cardiffs in violating the TRO.
He has transferred, loaned, concealed, and disbursed Cardiff assets.
He has failed to hold, preserve, and prohibit the disbursement, dissipation, or other disposal of Cardiff documents and assets.
He has taken actions that resulted in the dissipation of domestic or foreign assets, and in the hindrance of the repatriation of those assets.
He has failed to deliver Cardiff assets to the Receiver.
And he has failed to provide complete expedited discovery.
Jacques Poujade is a managing partner (and I believe owner ) of the loan company Lend Plus and mortgage company Tri-Emerald Financial Group.
As per the FTC, Poujade (right) helped the Cardiffs conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The funds at issue flowed through Sui & Company, Solicitors, to Pharmastrip Corp., to Alphatech Holdings, LLC, where they were used to pay for at least $206,000 USD in Cardiff personal expenses, plus additional expenses related to the Cardiffs’ ongoing cannabis film strip business ($490,000 USD in total).
The risk of continued dissipation of Cardiff frozen assets persists. In May 2019 alone, Alphatech received $65,000 USD from Pharmastrip Corp. – a company nominally controlled by Jacques Poujade’s brother, Richard Poujade, and funded by Clover Cannastrip Thin Film Technologies, Corp. – and spent $90,000 USD, including substantial payments to BarclayCard ($11,400), where the Cardiffs maintain several credit cards, Claremont Manor ($6,000), the retirement community where Jason Cardiff’s father lives, and payments to current Pharmastrip employees ($7,296.32 to Chief Chemist Yuan Yang and $5,658.91 to Manager Julie Green), among others.
Although the Alphatech account at US Bank was closed on May 24, 2019, substantial Cardiff frozen assets remain unaccounted for and have not been repatriated or turned over to the Receiver (the FTC has identified $4 million CAD in total Clover Cannastrip funds and machines valued at more than $500,000 USD).
This all happened in violation of the granted Redwood Scientific Technologies TRO.
The FTC’s show cause motion follows repeated notifications to the Cardiff’s and Poujade’s counsel of the regulator’s intent to initiate contempt proceedings.
Following the FTC’s June 17th filing, a hearing was scheduled for July 15th.
On June 18th Jacques Poujade filed an ex parte motion requesting the scheduled July 15th hearing be continued to August 19th.
The FTC opposed the motion, stating:
Given the virtual certainty that the Cardiffs will continue hiding and dissipating frozen assets as long as they are able to do so, and Jacques Poujade’s ongoing role in concealing those assets from the Receiver, a delay of the substantive hearing on the merits beyond July 15, 2019 will further jeopardize the funds ultimately available for consumer redress.
The court sided with the FTC and denied Poujade’s motion on June 24th.
That same day the court scheduled a July 30th show cause hearing.
Eunjung Cardiff, Jason Cardiff, and Jacques Poujade shall appear personally on July 30, 2019 and show cause, if any there be, why this Court should not find them in contempt for failure to comply with the Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction.
Such a Contempt Order could include coercive sanctions until each one complies with the Court’s Orders, and for Eunjung Cardiff and Jason Cardiff, those sanctions could include, but not necessarily be limited to, incarceration until they purge themselves of their contempt.
Should be a cracker of a hearing! Stay tuned…
Update 5th November 2019 – On October 29th a contempt order was issued.
As per the order the Cardiffs will be incarcerated until they comply with previously issued orders.
Jacques Poujade will be sanctioned with daily fines, starting at $5000, pending his compliance with the orders.
look for most people that read your blog they don’t understand the FTC is a very dangerous branch of the US gov and they are not fair.
I don’t see one thing that these guys have done wrong and there are no pending suits.
The FTC are holding Jason and Eunjung Cardiff accountable for their scamming.
You want to pretend the Cardiffs are saints and ignore their actions? Cool.
Let us know when you decide to rejoin the rest of us reality.
Can copy paste that a billion times and still not be done…
Look you guys have no idea what you are talking about here. I can not find one consumer law suit filed against the company or the Cardiff’s and I can not find any AG suits either.
I also just red that they had a 98% refund to all requested customers.
I am just saying there is something strange here and for some reason the top seller was TBX FREE and has 4 star ratings still on Amazon and other sites.
This sounds like a government Cash grab and shake down.
Seems like only in the USA are you guilty until proven innocent.
Not surprising, seeing as the FTC is neither a consumer or AG.
ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/172-3117-x190001/jason-cardiff-redwood-scientific-technologies-inc
The facts are damning. Stop making excuses for scammers.
Recently, I’ve come to realize how many ignorant Looney Tunes are actually living in the US.
I shouldn’t be surprised though after watching, for almost 20 years, how effective MLM brainwashing can be.
People ignoring facts and operating on belief is a concerning environment to be in.
does anyone know ware I can buy TBX FREE?
Now that Redwood is RIP your best bet would be one of their victims with excess inventory.
Cardiffs not in contempt of court seem like government overreaching has come to a end here looks like the judge knows what he is doing.
does this mean we can buy tbx free again.
This one seems to have fallen off my calendar for some reason. I’ll update today.
Spoiler: The Receiver was given access to the Cardiff’s residence. They were booted out while the appraisal took place.
Oh, and there’s also this:
and
I appreciate the case reminder but seeing as you’re clearly talking out of your ass, I’ll be marking any further claims that aren’t supported by evidence as spam.
Full update out later today.
As I follow this story it seems things are really heating up for the FTC and the Cardiff’s are ready to fight as it looks like they have new council the same group that beat the FTC in the 7th Circuit court of appeals.
It appears for the fillings I just read that the FTC may have a big fight on its hands if even part of what I read was true. I am looking for the Supreme court filing that must be floating around.
Does anyone here have any thoughts on this and does anyone know if Redwood was I business at the time of the FTC Suite. Its not clear based on what I have read.
I last checked the case docket on Jan 12th. Nothing was heating up then. Just more judicial losses for the Cardiffs and Poujade.
Hiring new counsel isn’t going to change that. Nor will comparing their case to some unrelated case the FTC may or may not have lost on appeal.
This case has nothing to do with the Supreme Court either, so not sure what you’re getting at there.