Will Zeek Rewards’ top thieves be named & shamed?
As the anniversary of Zeek Reward’s closure comes and goes, the noose around the necks of affiliates who took home the lion’s share of Ponzi profits grows steadily tighter.
The bar for court action has been set extremely low, with court-appointed Receiver Kenneth Bell advising that anyone who made $1000 or more in Zeek is a potential target. As an observer and someone who spends a great deal of time analysing the industry, for me there’s a particular interest in those at the top.
Those who made a few thousand will be dealt with in due course but of far greater interest are affiliates like this:
Randy Jarvis, a former Lexington resident and Zeek Rewards user met hundreds of affiliates while working at the Holiday Inn Express.
Upper-level affiliates would nearly book the entire hotel, some staying for weeks to attend “Red Carpet Events” run by the program’s former chief officer, Davidson County resident Paul Burks.
He said affiliates from Australia showed him how they were making $200,000 a day through the program while another couple from Vermont, who eventually talked him into signing up, showed him actual checks to validate the thousands they were making.
Why the particular interest in Zeek’s top affiliates over the not-so-profitable variety?
The receivership estimates that more than $295.5 million was “fraudulently transferred” to thousands of Zeek’s “net winners.”
It’s estimated that about 77,000 “net winners” pulled out more money than they put in. Several of the highest-profiting affiliates, who made more than $1 million through the program.
Through their wild income claims and check flashing, these are the top Zeek Rewards affiliates who collectively roped in who knows how many thousands of affiliate investors, the overwhelming majority of which lost money in the scheme.
Well, “lost” is probably not the most accurate of adjectives to use, as where the money wound up is wholly known. That being in the bank accounts of Zeek Reward’s top affiliates and in some instances, company management itself.
A testament to the greed of these top Ponzi thieves, many of whom are well-known in the MLM industry and continue to market similar schemes after Zeek was shut down, out of the 77,000 winners only ‘150 Zeek profiteers‘ to date have settled with the Receiver for a total of around $2 million dollars.
Instead of settling with the Receiver and handing over what they effectively stole, what have the rest of Zeek’s top affiliates been up to (in particular the aforementioned “highest-profiting” ones)?
Several of the highest-profiting affiliates, who made more than $1 million through the program, filed motions early on obstructing the receivership’s progress, including one that intended to dissolve the receivership altogether.
A federal judge denied all the measures.
Fighting tooth and nail in court to keep their ill-gotten gains.
Not only did they have the sheer audacity to fleece thousands of affiliate investors into what was always an obvious Ponzi scheme, now they’re pointedly giving them the finger.
Despite their silly legal ranting and raving about how “legal” Zeek Rewards was, Zeek’s top affiliates continue to plough on and defiantly refuse to settle with the Receiver – wholly to the detriment of Zeek Reward’s 840,000 net losers.
Should these top affiliates not settle, Bell intends to go after them in court.
Bell intends to get that money back through “clawback” lawsuits, which seek to recover profits from investors, employees or other parties who were transferred money.
Bell said the plan is to sue a handful of the largest profiteers by name, then follow up in a defensive class action, which will target a much larger group of “net winners.”
“I think we’ll sue 15,000 or 16,000 people in the next few months,” Bell said, adding that number does not reflect all the affiliates capable of being sued.
The class action is probably too broad in scope to pore over but I for one certainly hope that the top earning affiliates holding out are publicly named in Bell’s lawsuits.
“Clawback litigation is costly, can last for several years and does nothing more than both delay the claims process and deplete the potential funds available for distribution to victims,” Jordan Maglich, a Florida attorney and expert on Ponzi schemes said.
“And 99 percent of the time, there is no allegation that those clawback targets were complicit in the fraud or somehow anything different than those victims who lost money.
However, it is their decision to fight to keep their fraudulent gains to the detriment of their fellow victims that sets them aside from that group.”
There’s an entrenched attitude in Ponzi circles that deem participants largely untouchable and entitled to the money they steal.
Invest some money, convince thousands of people to do the same, withdraw their money through the compensation plan and then run off into the darkness with what you believe is now rightfully yours.
Pop up a few months later and wash, rinse and repeat.
How effective Bell will be putting a stop to that (god help the idiots who invested their Zeek money in similar ventures after the shutdown) remains to be seen, however as an analyst I’m expecting some MLM industry heavy-weight names to be dropped.
We know most of Zeek Rewards management were involved as affiliates, but how far the company’s tentacles extended into what is traditionally considered “legitimate MLM” is bound to raise eyebrows.
With this many people involved everything that went on inside Zeek is pretty much guaranteed to spill out once Bell files his lawsuits. Most of it is already public knowledge but to see actual dollar amounts attached to names will intensively clarify the true nature of those involved in unprecedented graphic detail.
That is of course if the list is made public, which I’m hoping it will.
It’s bad enough that these people are collectively directly responsible for recruiting a ton of people into the largest Ponzi scheme participants wide in US history. Now they want to keep the money too?
These people entirely deserve to be named and shamed, if not for public interest than at least for the well-bring of the MLM industry itself. Takes a lot of balls to rip that many people off and then try to keep the money you stole, despite being given ample time and opportunity to clear your name.
And seriously, anybody who thinks they have a hope in hell of convincing a judge they’re entitled to keeping their Ponzi profits during clawback litigation has got to be delusional.
There have been some setbacks, though, including sorting out terabytes of information in Zeek’s databases without nearly any help from company insiders.
“It’s not on standard business software. It’s stuff they created on their own, and they wrote code on their own,” Bell said.
“We didn’t have access to the insiders who created that software and data because they had government problems and aren’t at liberty to talk to me, I suppose.”
“Government problems” is diplomatic code for what’s coming down the track, which, after Bell is done, is pretty much guaranteed to be criminal proceedings against those responsible for Zeek Rewards.
So far, more than 110,000 claims, totaling more than $350 million, have been filed.
As a final note to anyone reading this who lost money in Zeek and hasn’t yet filed a claim with Bell, the deadline of September 5th 2013 is fast approaching.
What on earth are you waiting for?
Update 1st October 2013 – The first details of SEC action against Zeek Rewards’ paid consultants has been revealed.
On the 30th of September the SEC accepted a settlement offer from Troy Dooly (MLM Helpdesk), for his part in promoting Zeek Rewards and failing to and at times covering up his financial agreement with the company.
Update 4th March 2014 – On the 28th February 2014 the Receivership filed clawback litigation against Zeek Rewards insiders and top net-winners. An additional 9000 US-based net-winners who had also not yet settled with the Receivership were also named and shamed.
Oh man… T Le Mont better get selling a lot more of his famous ‘JubiCoffee’ lol
T Le Mont appears to have disappeared off into the wilderness.
The eventual realization that revenue-sharing was just another word for Ponzi scheme seems to have taken quite the toll.
He most likely took all his money… oops sorry other peoples money and took off to Chile or wherever he gonna hide.
He will pop up again.. hopefully on Americas Most Wanted™ lol
I’ve been sitting on the sidelines warning all the telexfree promoters that there appeared to be a completely different attitude about how the receivers, regulators and prosecutors were looking at these cases, and I’ve been ridiculed for being insane, out of touch and just another hater….seems as though my intuition may actually been pretty close to reality.
Unless this article is just a smoke screen by Bell to try to scare the net winners into compliance with the civil order, there just may be a change in the way in which every party to a scheme is held accountable….we shall see and time will tell.
Some people never learn…
LOL Oh what happen to the “JubiRev is the company that he does not have to start over anymore”?
When will the GOV do something about this dude?
Yeah there was an awful lot of emphasis on not having to “start over again” in Le Mont’s JubiRev marketing wasn’t there.
Oh well, here we are again – starting over… In one of the other videos he’s uploaded I heard he’s planning on moving overseas. Gotta wonder if he’s doing that just to dodge the Zeek Rewards Receiver…
Boy it must suck to have to uproot your family just because you can’t stay honest online.
T LeMont Silver will “not apologise” for leading people down the garden path chasing Ponzi riches with Zeek Rewards and JubiRev.
Claims he was “misled” that the model was viable, but “after seeing behind the scenes” now realises that “the math doesn’t add up”.
No shit?
Well sure, except that one other time (Zeek Rewards), oh and then there was that other time (Go Fun Rewards)… and who could forget that other time (JubiRev). Yeah but this time you’re really truly excited? No worries champ.
Silver mentions vision stretching an awful lot in the video. Personally I don’t think it’s visions that are going to be stretched as much as something else might be.
Bend over folks and let T. LeMont Silver stretch things for you. Stretch it real good.
God what a joke… anyone who follows this douch bag deserves to have their money taken.
Sorry, no one deserves to be taken advantage of, just wish this parasite would just go away.
Kinda speaks for his judgement, if we are to believe he was misled… each and every time. 😉
So, take your pick: either he’s incredibly stupid and naive, or he’s an evil calculating messiah that preaches money (if you follow him).
Either way you are doomed. 😀
Quick, someone make a side-by-side video, sort of LaMont’s Greatest hits, and below that put “cry wolf” with wolf howls, with “can you trust him?”
My in-laws are going through the receiver to try to get their money back now. Kind of hypocritical when they kept insisting that it wasn’t a Ponzi scheme, and even after it was shut down they were convinced that those top winners suing the receivership were going to win and Zeek was going to go back into business.
I guess when your money’s involved you’ll believe whatever makes you feel better, but I tried to warn them. The problem is that they won’t learn and they’ll keep falling for other get-rich-quick schemes.
Still in limbo here. Wish this would get over with, one way or the other.
Didn’t your husband have an opportunity to settle?
Those who made voluntarily settlements made all sorts of deals, from good to not so good, from 40% payment to 80% payment, from “finish the case now” to “12 months monthly payment”.
I’m pretty sure it’s still possible to settle the case. There’s nothing in the law that prevents a late settlement (nothing I know about). I’m pretty sure the Receiver will be very happy closing a few more claims.
I analysed the settlements briefly. “Cash in hand” seems to be a better solution than “12 month payment”, but that was only for a specific range of claims, e.g. $20,000 to $50,000.
Settlements will typically be about a reduced amount, while a court case will be about the full amount. There IS a clear incentive in settling the claim voluntarily. It’s typically the difference between “minor profit” and “loss”, e.g. a $540,000 claim was settled for $450,000 = $90,000 in profit. Most other claims was much lower.
From my opinion, any cash settlement of up to 80% of the claim will be a very good deal (if people have the money to settle it cash). Any deal involving monthly payments is “less acceptable”, but it will reduce some of the risk.
People should not be TOO eager to settle the claims either, it should normally be a solution acceptable for both parties. It didn’t pay for the ones who already have settled the claims being too eager, the claims around the middle of the list generally made better deals (within a specific range).
Your husband will probably be more interested if you present the idea about “difference between minor profit and loss”, a method to KEEP some of his profit rather than being “all in” in a court case.
He isn’t very eager. Zeek was the first MLM project where he really made some money by joining the program early.
Relatively vague ideas about “dissolving the temporarily appointed Receiver” promised more “rewards” than any settlement can offer, for some reason.
In sale, people must first be INTERESTED (knowingly or unknowingly) before you can offer anything. So I tried to identify one IDEA he potentially could be interested in, the idea of “KEEPING some of the profit rather than risking it all”. Most of my post was about “making a good deal” logic, rather than about “clawback ideas”.
That was a vain hope from day one.
The Bar date for submitting loss-claims against the estate is September 5th, about a week from today.
Just a minor update on one of the top Zeek Rewards Ponzi net-winners, T LeMont Silver is fleeing the US in a few days.
Deadline for the Receivership claims just expired and that means claw-back lawsuits are on the way.
Is Silver just moving house or running from the Receiver in an attempt to keep his Ponzi profits? You decide!
Makes you wonder if the companies should be starting to screen people who join lest they “ruin” the company’s image. 😉 (nah, never happen)
It’s coming…
http://www.zeekrewardsreceivership.com/pdf/ZRWUpdatefromReceiver9.6.13.pdf
Yes, could have settled, but chose to ignore it all.
What TYPE of defense arguments does he plan to use? I don’t need an answer, but he should have one.
“Unfreeze of third party funds” didn’t work.
“Overly broad and burdensome subpoena” worked.
“Dissolving temporarily appointed Receiver” didn’t work.
One of them worked, the two others didn’t.
“Wishful thinking” = hoping to win in Court, without having a realistic plan for how to do it. I can’t find any solutions within that range.
“Gambling” = hoping to win in Court, but backed up by a realistic plan for how to do it. I’m not able to identify any such ideas, but I haven’t exactly looked for them either.
From my viewpoint, settlement is actually a good solution if people have the money to settle it cash in one payment. The best deals were typically settled in one single payment (rather than monthly payments). But I mostly checked a specific range of $20,000 to $60,000. Realistic range for settlements in that range were 67-80% of total amount.
It looked like they had 2 different types of negotiators, one eager to close the deal ASAP as long as the deals were “in range”, and one spending more time on details (less eager to close the deal, less willing to accept a range without clearly having justified it in facts).
I have simply ignored the May 31st deadline. That deadline isn’t very important as far as I can see. Civil claims should preferrably be resolved outside Court (if possible). That rule is more important than deadline rules.
There is no plan at all as far as I know, well except the ignore it thing.
Here’s one way to try to avoid paying back people who lost money in Zeek Rewards when the Receiver comes after you…
Uproot your wife and kids and move to the Dominican Republic.
If this is true, he will never be able to enter the US again without being arrested. It is inevitable that a warrant for his arrest will be issued.
Some people seem to think they can earn money while living abroad and they are exempt from their obligations as a US citizen.
So he has giving up his Freedom of being an American to live in the “hills” of a third world county.
Just the type of leader you want to follow.
A real coward, an unpatriotic piece of real trash.
Maybe he’s just “going home”… (sorry, bad joke)
Not yet, Jan. Not until the receiver slaps him with contempt of court by leaving the country and dodging the debt that is owed. And his US assets, if any, may be seized via a court judgement, but that’s in the future. Receiver has to finish the lawsuit first.
Hold up on the Troy Dool Zeek comments, I’ll have an article out shortly.
Latest Zeek Receivership update is out but unfortunately no mention of clawback litigation against the net-winners is mentioned.
What is mentioned though is the expectation that partial payments will be distributed to victims before the year closes out.
Oh and no chance of a re-opening of the claims process because it’s too costly, wastes too much time would be unfair to those who have already filed their claims.
To be perfectly fair, you’d have to be pretty braindead to have not filed your claim in the ample time provided.
Update from the Receiver (Quarter 3 report):
Some have already paid, dunno if we’ll ever find out who they are:
As for Zeek Rewards staff and insiders:
It’s as above for the third-party advisors, vendors and service providers of Zeek too.