GSPartners’ G999 an off the shelf scamcoin script?
GSPartners’ G999 appears to be an off the shelf purchased shitcoin script.
One that’s been used to launch at least two scamcoins.
On the G999 website it is represented the cryptocurrency was developed in 2018.
2018 first quarter – composing blockchain team
2018 second quarter – analysing blockchain opportunities, requirements, compatibility
2018 third quarter – setting up the project and roughly line up the ecosystem
2018 fourth quarter – started to develop the blockchain under proof of stake algorithm
In the footer of G999’s website there is a community links section. There a link to “BitBucket” takes you to G999’s blockchain source package.
The default file opened is the readme. It contains general information about G999’s source package.
Nothing remarkable. With a bit of directory traversal we can see the package was uploaded in November 2018, which syncs with what G999 claims on its website.
What I want to direct your attention to though is the “Need Help?” section in the readme file. Specifically the “BitcoinTalk” link.
That link points to the BitcoinTalk forum thread for SafeInsure Coin (SINS).
SINS was launched in September 2018. At least as far as I know, it has nothing to do with GSPartners or G999.
As to what SINS is, it was your typical pump and dump shitcoin scheme.
Having run its course, SafeInsure Coin was abandoned on or around April 2020. SINS’ blockchain stopped working altogether in early 2021.
Preceding SINS being abandoned was the launch of SafeCapital (SCAP) in December 2019.
SCAP was of course another pump and dump shitcoin:
The owners of SINS simply double down and launched a new shitcoin, targeting the same victims.
SCAP was abandoned on or around July 2020.
Getting back to G999, the reason there’s a BitcoinTalk forum link to SINS in the G999 readme is because all they did was change the scamcoin name.
Here’s G999’s readme:
See if you can spot the difference between the SINS and SCAP readme files:
You can verify this yourself by looking at the source files (GSPartners, SINS and SCAP).
Update 16th July 2021 – Shortly after this article was published, GSBank deleted the referenced G999 source readme file.
The above screenshot is a record of the file, accessed at the time of publication.
I did have a link to the file but seeing as its been deleted I’ve replaced the original link to a record of the file’s deletion.
It’s not as neat as the original file display but you can still reference the similarities. /end update
Update 24th July 2021 – GSBank has deleted the commit entry. This appears to be an attempt to remove evidence G999 is a clone of the SINS and SCAP scamcoins.
As a result of GSBank deleting the commit evidence I’ve had to remove the “GSPartners” link above. /end update
Another example of copy and paste can be found further scrolling down G999’s readme to “Development”.
There you’ll find a broken link to SINS’ “root readme” file.
As to who GSPartners’ bought their G999 shitcoin script from, no idea. Given the collapse of SINS and SCAP, they’re probably long gone.
GSPartners’ G999 BitBucket code project hasn’t been updated since October 2020.
What we do know is G999 wasn’t developed by a “blockchain team”, as represented by GSPartners.
They just bought a script, entered their project name and executed it.
Like SINS and SCAP, G999 pumped and then promptly dumped.
Unlike SINS and SCAP, there’s an MLM comp plan on the backend still generating money for GSPartners’ owner Josip Heit.
Any takers on XLT being another copy/paste job of the same script?
That’s not a fair bet, at this point i’m ready to believe they borrowed the logo even.
There you went and did it Oz.
I searched the web.
The Gold Lion Crowned thing is QUITE popular, i’m not finding the exact variant elsewhere, but many logos close enough for a conceptual clone.
The GSB logo was ripped off from the Stratton Oakmont logo.
Close, but there are closer examples. I’m giving the benefit that some kid on Fiverr got $10 to do something off of a template.
Great work. Let’s see what the koolaid makers will say in order to explain this away to the drinkers. They are monitoring these posts.
I was reading the posts on Bitcoin talk. Very interesting the way the whole thing was set up and the comparisons and similarities to g999 are striking.
I cannot wait for Owen Millet, aka Golden Independence, to explain this one away! LULZ!
And in other breaking news…
(Ozedit: link removed)
Any takers on XLT being another copy/paste job of the same script?
I think it is in the name: XLT = Excel-T
Looks like G999 is deleting files:
bitbucket.org/gsbank/g999/commits/99811895a6dddfc261f1b3d9ab124e27cd3fe1af
@Gertrude
I removed that link. I’ve seen that story before and it is uncited. Strong Gerlach Report vibes.
Thanks for that. To be a fly on the wall when Josip Heit had a yell at whoever failed to cover their tracks.
Don’t see the point though, it’s all archived for anyone to verify.
Next up,repo gets deleted due to “security” issues hehe
Heit’s Ukrainian lawyers could always send BitBucket a cease and desist…
“I say blockchain, idiots give me money. What you mean blockchain means everyone can see what I doing!?
Get Alex on phone… I have words.”
@Oz – Ok.
Lawl. GSBank deleted the commit entry.
Hide the evidence! Nothing to see here!
What evidence *stares away*
“Tell Mr. Bermuda I am acceptable. I send one trillion G999 now. Just wait computer to finish making.”
“Computer is make coins one thousand per second. Should have trillion coins in—what?—couple of days, maybe?
“Thirty-two… YEARS?
“Get Alex on phone… I have words."
😀
This is informative and beneficial for people to know. There are so many scams on the internet and people should always check out a company before signing up.
Secondly, they should read the Policy and Procedures if they can find them, or the Terms of Agreement.
If you can’t find the above on their website. You should move on because that’s a big red flag.
Terri Pattio
MLM Coach/Mentor with a servant’s heart
G999 went to the moon today
$900k at one point
coinmarketcap.com/currencies/g999/
CoinMarketCap bug. Data was all over the place. Graphs still borked.
That said, take a look at the regular G999 value graph. Up and down, up and down, up and down – all within a preset range.
No manipulation there. No sir.