Where do you get your MLM news from?
“Why can’t you be more like BusinessForHome?”
About once a month, sometimes more, sometimes less, I get asked the above question or a derivative of it.
The implication behind the question is that I tend to focus purely on what is perceived to be “negative” viewpoints, which is reflected in the content published on BehindMLM.
And that’s a fair call.
While I don’t perceive information strictly in a positive and negative sense, by far the bulk stories we cover would probably fall in the latter category.
I assure you however this isn’t by design. I’m far from running around the internet intentionally digging up stories that paint the MLM industry in the worst light possible.
Rather that’s the nature of a free press. It’s “news”, it’s what we report on. Information that goes deeper than what’s evident on the surface is what people want to read about.
As an MLM blogger I see my role in the industry as keeping readers informed. To me personally, that doesn’t equate to republishing spammy press-releases or working in cahootz with MLM companies to publish advertising material.
I wish I could say the same about other bloggers in the MLM niche.
BusinessForHome is a website operated by Direct Selling Global News LTD, a “Seychelles limited partnership based out of Hong Kong with a
principal place of business located (in the) Netherlands”.
Ted Nuyten (right) is the CEO of Direct Selling Global News LTD.
Despite this, there is no mention of Direct Selling Global News LTD on the BusinessForHome website:
The Business For Home.org website is an initiative of Ted Nuyten, CEO and Chairman of the Business For Home Foundation, which is established in year 2007, in the Netherlands under Dutch law and Dini Noorlander, acting as Chief Relations Officer.
Direct Selling Global News LTD has however appeared on BehindMLM, as the entity behind BitCoin Economy.
BitCoin Economy was a chain-recruitment scheme launched in early 2014. It has since collapsed.
In my January 2014 BitCoin Economy review, I did note Nuyten’s promotion of the scheme on BusinessForHome. However at the time I was unaware he was the owner of Direct Selling Global News LTD.
Nor, to the best of my knowledge, was this ever disclosed either to myself after the review was published or on the BusinessForHome website.
Ted Nuyten seemingly launching chain-recruitment schemes however is not what I want to discuss today.
This morning a copy of BusinessForHome’s “IN THE SPOTLIGHT” SERVICE AGREEMENT” came across my desk:
Dated October 1st, 2015, the agreement appears to be a contract put together by BusinessForHome.
Before I go on, I’ll acknowledge that to some extent BusinessForHome do acknowledge their content may border on marketing spam:
At times we publish interviews with top earners and corporate executives and place them in the spotlight. (You need to have a great story)
Turns out however that you don’t need a great story at all. Just $36,000.
In exchange for $36,000 a year, BusinessForHome will
post to its website at and other social media websites, under its ownership and control, feature articles referred to as “In the Spotlight” articles.
An In the Spotlight article is a feature of the BFH website that highlights a Direct Selling company in a positive manner.
• BFH will coordinate the publishing of all In the Spotlight articles and features;
Articles are defined as positive and non-disparaging information and reviews concerning Company. Such articles shall be published through the BFH website and to recipients in the BFH newsletter database.
A minimum of four+ (4+) articles per month which could be produced in cooperation with Company’s marketing department.
• BFH will provide Company with an opportunity to review the content prior to publishing.
Company will have seven (7) business days to review and approve all articles.
The contract can either be paid annually at $36,000 or monthly at $4000 ($48,000 annually).
And if an MLM company wants out before the year is up – they are slugged with a $15,000 exit fee:
In the event this agreement is terminated prior to the first anniversary date, there shall be a penalty payment owed by Company in the amount of $15,000 or the remaining amount due under the contract, whichever is less.
“Less” would have to see a client cancel the BusinessForHome agreement after seven months ($21,000 paid).
In a nutshell, you pay Ted Nuyten $3000 to $4000 a month and you can be rest assured any critical, controversial or “negative” information about your company will not be reported.
And not only for the duration fees are paid for, but also twelve months thereafter:
Prohibited Publications.
BFH shall not publish or cause to be published any negative, disparaging, or false articles, opinions, or other statement regarding Company to BFH owned, operated or maintained websites, newsletters, or other media during the term of this Agreement and for a period of one year after termination of this Agreement.
No negative articles, no negative opinions, no negative statements whatsoever. A complete whitewash of information.
Individuals can purchase a similar service for a $1500 “investment”, which gets them an ‘in depth review or interview‘.
That this is the publishing policy of one of the largest, if not the largest MLM blogs out there – is pretty depressing.
As to how many companies are paying Ted Nuyten $36,000 a year for coverage, I have no idea.
But it does place a big question mark on coverage of major events taking place within the MLM industry.
The objective (BusinessForHome) is to show the “outside” world, Direct Selling, Network Marketing, MLM is a great way to earn an honest living with unlimited potential.
Does that still hold true if a company has paid thousands of dollars for “positive coverage”?
Disclosure wise I was unable to find any trace of what MLM companies BusinessForHome have as clients. No articles on the website disclose the content is paid for.
Financial disclosure as a general rule is a good idea. But when you’re charging 3500+ “subscribers” (your readers) $37.50 a year, $57.50 for every two years or $77 every five years, it’s inexcusable.
Furthermore this paid artificial content is then pushed on the MLM industry at large via social media. I’m sure we’ve all seen BusinessForHome articles pop up on Facebook and other networks, often cited as a credible and independent source of MLM news.
All said and done, am I suggesting you don’t read BusinessForHome?
No, of course not. Lord knows there’s far too much news in the MLM industry for me to cover by myself.
But beyond the meaningless popularity polls (easily the biggest traffic drawcard for the site), have a look at the actual substance of what is published there.
Facts are facts and myself and Ted Nuyten are probably the biggest MLM bloggers around at the moment.
Nuyten has a staff roster who publish content to BusinessForHome, with articles he puts together sprinkled in every other day.
Source-information gathering here at BehindMLM is often a collective effort with readers, however I myself sit down and pen each and every article that goes live.
No money changes hands, I have no clients and I work for myself on all facets of day-to-day operations at BehindMLM. It’s a lot of work and I often find myself pulling six or seven-day weeks.
This is how I’ve run the site for nearly six years and I enjoy doing what I do.
The difference between these two approaches ultimately doesn’t matter, provided what is published maintains the integrity of the “MLM news” niche.
As a voice with some weight in that niche, I have to call out BusinessForHome’s conduct regarding paid content as anything but.
Think about that $36,000 fee the next time you rush to repost a BusinessForHome article on Facebook, or send me an email asking me why I’m not “more like Ted Nuyten”.
The same goes for ‘The Obtainer’ direct selling magazine.
flexkomglobal.weebly.com/awards.html
Thanks for sharing that BusinessForHome is selling its soul to the devil!
Pretty pointless to try and guess which companies have or have not been paying Ted for “positive and non-disparaging information and reviews,” it’s doubtless that at least some of them have. But I’m almost to the point of saying “what of it”?
Keith Laggos ran NMBJ for years and anyone willing to notice the fine print knew his “Company of the Month” feature was pure paid for publicity. Yet those glowing “reviews” were passed around the downlines like they were some form of expert endorsement.
There’s a quote that probably didn’t come from George Orwell but fits here:
There is no, or almost no journalism INSIDE the network marketing industry and PR oozes from every orifice. Yet amazingly enough it’s the “outsiders” who’s motives are constantly questioned.
How much did Zeek pay them is what I want to know. Stuffing that poll can’t be cheap.
ruja’s onecoin was a top contender on businessforhome’s popularity chart recently.
then ted nuyten threw onecoin out of the list claiming that he had received indications of ‘fake’ voting on onecoin.
either nuyten realized his businessforhome website would look very silly if onecoin won, or ruja’s cheque to him may have bounced!
i found a post dated march, 2014 which credits ted nuyten as the founder of ‘bitcoin economy’:
For this single grain of sand on the mlm beach, you did name the only two sources of industry info I regularly read… BehindMLM and Nuyten’s BFH.
In light of this article, my next comment is most likely, ‘and then there was one’ — except that, now, I’ll want to know who is being favored in BFH in order to stay abreast of current contributors to this, er, smelly promotional arrangement. Thanks for the input.
As always, valuable information. The same thing is happening with Spanish “MLM news site”.
Only are published information that MLM companies release. There is no a personal opinion. We only know what companies want us to know.:(
Please, when you have time, also do an investigation to the universomlm.com owner, Alain Herrera Fernandez. He was promoting the Telexfre Ponzi scheme heavily in this site until telexfre fell.
He was one of the top Hispanic Telexfree leaders. Now, he’s masquerading the site as a multilevel news portal to attract people to their new scam: Fort Ad Pays end pyramid scheme, which, same as Telexfre, is promoting heavily in the site.
Proof:
livestream.com/accounts/7489748/followers
universomlm.com/blog/307/como-apoyar-a-telexfree-frente-a-tanto-ataque
Now I understand why GWT Global Wealth Trade gets such rave reviews on Business for Home. Good company but ovr the top coverage.
There are many so called “MLM Experts” online, who try to confince people they know all about MLM.
Most of them are just pushing some deals, like Ted and another well known “expert” from Florida.
Claiming they know everything but confused when one of those deals is a scam…
Keep up the good work Oz!
– Source businessforhome.org/2012/11/united-networker-magazine-interviews-ted-nuyten/
the above statement of ted nuyten does not acknowledge that BFH accepts payments for pumping a particular MLM company by posting glowing reviews. ‘interviews’ are not ‘reviews’.
the MLM company reviews on BFH website are made to ‘appear’ to be ‘independent’ reviews.
it is completely unethical to charge subscribers for access to MLM reviews which are commissioned by the companies. ted nuyten rakes in the cash from both ends, taking advantage of the trust readers invest in him.
i mean, consider this clause in the ‘secret’ contracts nuyten signs with MLM companies;
c’mon ethan vanderbuilt!
Ted doesn’t actually endorse these companies but he is getting paid to run a “highly favorable article” about them.
Does that cross the line of Article vs Endorsement? It would seem so to me.
If it does, Ted is guilty of violating a FTC guideline, IMO. Any legal minds out there? 🙂
ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/ftcs-endorsement-guides-what-people-are-asking
This just reminds me of an email exchange between me and Ted during Zeek’s heyday, when I raised some issues about it and asked him how come he’s not covering it.
His answer was, paraphrased “I can’t talk about it.”
In light of the agreement above, that response suddenly made a lot more sense.
Yeah, except he’s in Europe. Technically out of FTC’s jurisdiction.
@K Chang – Thanks for the heads up about Ted being in Europe as some of the readers of this site might not have known. businessforhome.org/about-us/
My question was, “Did Ted cross the line between “Article vs Endorsement”?
He’s relatively open about that paid interviews is one of the sources of revenue.
Troy Dooly was fined $3,000 by SEC for his paid endorsement of ZeekRewards in 2012, partly because he actively tried to pretend that he wasn’t paid by anyone.
My answer is “no, he doesn’t cross any line there” (any relevant one).
* He’s relatively open about that he does offer those types of services, but people must be looking for it to be able to find it — and they must contact Ted Nuyten personally to get the details.
* It’s not something ANY company or person can buy, so it doesn’t really belong in any “official price list”.
A reasonable person will be able to find out that some (or many) interviews and stories most likely are paid for by companies or individuals. It’s clearly reflected or openly described on the website.
Thanks M Norway
I thought a “general disclaimer statement” was not enough. He should make it clear on EACH “advertorial” that the company paid Ted to “say these nice things about us”
At least Oz has made it clear for all to see now.
Troy Dooly will need to do that. But the difference is that Troy Dooly actively tried to mislead people about his own involvment as a paid “market manipulator” for ZeekRewards. And he denied being paid for it when people asked him about it.
SEC probably received complaints about it from several victims. I don’t think BFH will generate the same type of complaints.
“It’s about preferences”
The first two lines of this article …
“Why can’t you be more like that other blog?” is about preferences — what people prefer to read. Some people will prefer “success stories”, “MLM Top earners” and similar types of material. They don’t really like critical reviews (at least they don’t like too much of it).
I would have interpreted it as “we prefer a different balance between positive and negative perspectives, there’s too much of one of them”.
Troy Dooly violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act, less serious than 17(a) but serious enough to be fined $3,000 and to receive an injunction.
The fact that people are being paid for something isn’t a problem in itself. It may become a problem if the intention is to mislead people / assisting others to mislead people.
That’s how people generally will see it, where the relevant legal and ethical lines are — the ones we can cross.
* They don’t see Forbes Brand Voice as a problem, but they will see OneCoin Ruja Ignatova’s specific use of it as a problem. “Interviewed by Forbes Magazine” was actively used to add credibility to a Ponzi scheme.
* Gerald Nehra’s endorsement of TelexFree was a problem in itself. He produced false and misleading information people could use in marketing videos.
Well, this is interesting: businessforhome.org/mlm-blacklist/
How you going to blacklist OneCoin but not put Igor Alberts on that list Ted?
Is Ted payed by Igor Alberts? Can’t find any other reason why Ted doesn’t warn people to run away from that awful Dutch scammer.
Ted and his businessforhome website makes many victims.
There have been far too many DagCoin/Success Factory promo articles on BFH for it to be a coincidence.
BFH doesn’t disclose any of its clients though.
@Austrian schnitzel
In May 2021, Andreea Cimbala bought this “interview” from Ted Nuyten. What did she pay for it?
share-your-photo.com/931e987d80
share-your-photo.com/1e0fece4f4
youtube.com/watch?v=SvWRkWPD7vo
Does Ted Nuyten now sell training? Video from December 2021:
share-your-photo.com/9aef446c6b
youtube.com/watch?v=WJqGbak8S9w
Of course, Ted Nuyten also presents Iulian Cimbala, Adreea Cimbala’s brother, with a video:
share-your-photo.com/02cfaf01b8
youtube.com/watch?v=nlNBffBBaIc