Indian TVI scam highlights regulatory inadequacy
About two months ago, news broke in India that the long-running TVI Express pyramid scheme had resurfaced amongst Nagpur state-run railway employees.
Known as the “Central Railway Department”, with senior management ringleading the recruitment drive it was estimated that “hundreds” had been duped into believing they would receive ‘double returns in eight days‘.
Following a Times of India investigation blowing the pyramid scheme wide open, much huffing and puffing ensued, with the end result seeing central figure in the scam, Movement Inspector Komal Gajbhye, pay out one of the members he scammed and the Divisional Railway Manager then transferring Gajbhye and another top recruiter to a post that put considerable distance between themselves and their victims.
To date, as far as I’m aware, not one government agency has launched an investigation into the Central Railway recruitment scheme, nor has the department itself fired anyone.
An inquiry was raised by the department, to be handled by an assistant personnel officer (APO) but that appears to have been “buried”.
In a followup piece to his original article (published October 27th, 2012), journalist Vijay Pinjarkar gives his account of the events leading up to and shortly after the publication of his article:
The story landed up with me when a source saw a group of women slugging it out with a senior movement inspector (MI) in the DRM office premises.
One of the irate women even tried to hurl a chappal (slipper) at him for committing fraud. The MI had promised double returns in eight days by luring the poor women into the scheme.
I found that over a dozen MIs and a young lady with the signalling department had virtually fleeced many employees by misusing official position and machinery.
Many were made members even after the TVI shut shop in 2010. The scam grew like a weed difficult to root out.
On October 26 evening, when I was filing the story, I talked to 2 MIs, who were masterminds. Both admitted to selling memberships to make a quick buck.
My phone call pressed the panic button and the MIs involved, who chose the immoral way to become rich, huddled to stop the story.
After a while, the MI himself called me. He said, “Saheb, let’s talk when I return from Wardha. Till then you stop the story?”
Around 10 pm, the MI called me again to say, “Saheb, I’ve reached Nagpur. Where can we meet? Has the story been stopped? It will spoil my career? I’m even ready to come to your place?
The next day, the story was on the front page. It made a lot of buzz.
The MIs ducked for cover till their ‘godfather’ (senior divisional operating manager), who was on leave, returned. I was flooded with calls from hapless employee-victims who blessed me for the expose.
I used to attend at least 10-12 calls daily from employees giving me tips about corruption and illegal acts of MIs and operating managers.
Except for shifting 2 MIs, the SrDOM adopted the ‘teri bhi chup aur meri bhi chup’ (you pat my back and I will pat yours) policy.
Attempts are being made to bring back these MIs, who flatter the bosses. Even after follow up stories based on the complaints, neither the DRM nor the SrDOM showed any conviction to launch a serious probe.
For name-sake, an inquiry has been handed over to an assistant personnel officer (APO) only to bury it later.
Following the publication of Pinjarkar’s expose, those scammed of their money were “threatened (and told) to withdraw (their complaints)”, with those close to Central Railways management even go so far as to contact Pinjarkar’s family members to get them to urge him “stop writing about the scam”.
To put all this into perspective, Indian Railways is a government-run enterprise that made $1.75 billion USD in 2011-2012 and employs 1.4 million people.
Yet here we have senior management abusing their positions and recruiting hundreds of people into a scam “running into crores of rupees”, and not one single government authority has gotten involved, much the less launched an investigation into the whole sorry affair.
With stories like this coming out of India, is it any wonder that investigations into bigger scams have been dragging on for years?
These days I’m most commonly asked about Speak Asia, which was shut down by Indian authorities in mid 2011.
Speak Asia was a hybrid Ponzi/pyramid scheme, which relied on new recruits pumping new investor money to keep the Ponzi scheme the company was running afloat.
Following the bust and Indian authorities declaring Speak Asia to be “the largest fraud case they’ve ever seen”, the company launched a series of campaigns in an attempt to stop the authorities from investigating them, and to legalize Ponzi schemes in India.
This was done via the filing of numerous legal cases against the Indian authorities (and anyone else in India who dared speak up about the scam), with management even going so far to as to have their legal counsel commit perjury in the Supreme Court of India.
With most of the company’s legal action eventually dismissed or just flat-out thrown out of court, the authorities have been left to conclude their investigations for some months now, with seemingly little to no progress being made.
Last I heard defacto local management ringleader Ashok Bahirwani was playing games with the Mumbai Economic Offences Wing (EOW), wanting to film his interrogation sessions with the agency.
With Speak Asia’s management either missing overseas or unaccounted for in India itself, this case doesn’t look like it’s going to be resolved anytime soon.
It was this time last year that those following the case were eagerly looking forward to chargesheets being filed against the company (ample evidence exists proving the company was a Ponzi/pyramid scheme hybrid), but a year later we’re pretty much where we were last year.
Something about the Ministry of Corporate Affairs saying they don’t have jurisdiction over international companies, a bill before parliament proposing to change that and the local police… well, who knows what they’re doing.
Meanwhile hundreds of millions of dollars were siphoned off overseas, management of Speak Asia remain at large and the company continues to use aforementioned money to do what it can to hamper investigations and draw out the legal process as long as it can.
I don’t know what is going on India but as a casual observer, it seems from a local to international level, the country’s authorities are woefully inadequately equipped to deal with the scale of pyramid and Ponzi schemes that exist and operate there.
If self-confessed government employees running a recruitment driven pyramid scheme from within a government department involving hundreds of people can’t be brought to justice, what hope is there for bringing in those in who are hiding overseas and operated national scams that ran into the hundreds of millions of dollars?
Update 30th December 2012 – Vijay Pinjarkar has put out another article with the Times of India giving an update on the TVI Express Central Railway Department recruitment scam:
In a face-saving exercise, three movement inspectors (MIs) and a lobby in-charge were shifted on Thursday evening for their involvement in the TVI (Travel Ventures International) Express scam.
With this the number of MIs who have been transferred has gone up to 5. There were complaints against the lobby in-charge. On November 1, two MIs – P D Raut and Komal Gajbhiye – both kingpins, were shifted to Chiconda and Hinganghat stations respectively.
On Thursday, DK Soni, SS Karnale and SK Jaiswal, all MIs, and CP Varshney, the lobby in-charge were shifted. Central Railway PRO P D Patil did not go into the details and termed the transfers as routine. Interestingly, it took over 15-20 years to shift these tainted employees who were occupying sensitive posts.
The transfers seem to be cosmetic as all those shifted have been posted in Nagpur only. “It will defeat the basic purpose of employees getting justice. These people being in Nagpur will continue to scare their victims,” employees said.
Soni, who is said to be close to the bosses and made maximum TVI members, was shifted as deputy station superintendent (DySS) at Nagpur. Varshney has also been posted as DySS. Jaiswal and Karnale were posted as cabin ASMs at Ajni. Karnale is mostly involved in diverting pointsmen for household work in Sr DOM’s quarter.
Meanwhile, the transfers have caused resentment among the operating department employees who had registered in advance for getting posted in Nagpur.
Still no involvement or even acknowledgement from the Indian authorities as Indian Railways continues to sweep the blatant involvement of their management staff in a known pyramid scheme under the carpet.
What a farce.
Please give me the details of this alleged scam and I will help the victims!
My contact nos. are 9867156553 / 8652176000
My email ID is pficmum@gmail.com
I did not read of this scam in the Times of India or any other newspaper!
I am waiting!
For those who have just come to this website – I am the original complainant against Speak Asia and have even gone to the Supreme Court in person and got orders whereby a stay in the Bombay High Court was vacated.
I was alone and there were 18 advocates who did not support me.
Mr. Kkhosla, I tracked TVI Express, which originated in India, for several years. Check my blog dedicated to this:
http://kschang.blogspot.com/
Article Update: It appears more senior management have been shifted away from those they’ve scammed, furthering attempts by Indian Railways to minimise the fallout of their involvement in the scam.
Is the government going to investigate the government? Seems unlikely.
Someone needs to get the EOW involved. 🙂
@kkhosla
Hi I am balaji from Chennai. I am ready to fight with company ( speak Asia ) if they are refused to make the exit payment to all the panelists this is my mail id balaji99437@gmail.com I am also having all the proofs.
kkhosla shall I able to join in that case if possible means tell me I am having around 20 members if I said means they also join in that case
As of now SpeakAsia appears to be dead (executing First imaginary test batch then Second and …) and Ashok Bahirwani is trying to save his a** from EOW.
Here is a HC hearing that clears many doubts. It is funny that now Bahirwani claims himself as a “victim of the designs of the Company”. And yes Anju Agarwal and “Jai SpeakAsia” slogan also managed to reach this HC hearing 🙂
Ah so anju paid off Kkhosla. Well no wonder she’s pissed, that strategy failed miserably.
And lol at the EOW using “Jai SpeakAsia” against Bahirwani. Good to see they’re aren’t completely asleep :).
That strategy gave them the STAY-order for several months, so it worked partly.
Kkhosla was the one that theoretically could have a legal right to get some insight into WRIT 383. That case interfered with his case WRIT 3611. The other Defendant in that case (EOW) had insight into WRIT 383, so Kkhosla could potentially claim a similar right as the other Defendant.
Bahirwani’s lawyer (Mr. Abdi) probably saw that possibility too.
Paying off Kkhosla was used as one of the main arguments for getting a stay in EOW’s investigation of Bahirwani and AISPA, from March 23rd to September. That argument is still being used in Bahirwani’s defense strategy.
So Bahirwani/AISPA have got something important in exchange for the money. The settlement was a wise strategy, to reduce some unknown risks for both parties.
I was afraid (on the behalf of Kkhosla) that the court would reject the settlement, but it has been accepted in every order until the case was “closed”.
I don’t think she’s pissed off. Manoj Kumar did probably “pay the bill”, the others were only lending him some money for a while.
Manoj Kumar is interested in reducing potential claims against himself as best as he can. The Exit Option is mostly about that, reducing some of the claims. The settlement with Kkhosla fits well into that strategy.
Kkhosla is the one that has caused him most trouble since May 2011. He was the First Informant in FIR 60, has met in more than 30 meetings with EOW, has met in each and every court hearings (except one), has tried to intervene in WRIT 383, tried to intervene in the mediation, has reported the news about Mr. Colibri to EOW, and so on and so forth.
Several people in SpeakAsia’s management have been interrogated and/or arrested because of Kkhosla.
I’m pretty sure Manoj Kumar will prefer to REDUCE Kkhosla’s direct interest in the case rather than increasing it. 🙂
“Direct interest” was used as a substitute for “monetary claims”. It will be in Manoj Kumar’s best interest if Kkhosla have absolutely no monetary claims against him.
(Ozedit: English only please)
well the company was kind enough to join in this anticipatory bail application of bahirwani because his affidavit stated that the EOW had probably NOT understood the business of the company .
meanwhile, i dont think in india, we put people away for saying JAI to anything . there’s freedom of speech and all that crap .
also the company has started exit payments , the process is slow , but people are receiving money .the EOW came out on TV to say these payments are lies and the payment proofs posted on speakasia forums and AISPA are fake . well ,good luck to them with that .
also, i’m currently ‘gagged’ so NO TALKING about speaksia from me ,but feel free to carry on .
@M_Norway
True, true. Always have to factor in the layers of smoke and mirrors when it comes to this lot.
quite close. all the people who paid to help AISPA settle khosla’s dues, have written to the company to be reimbursed.
so manoj kumar WILL end up paying the bill .
it’s only fair.
Someone finally found out “They have suffered enough from that nonsense, so it’s time to ‘gag’ her”, or “They have probably become immune by now, so we can drop further infestation”? 🙂
Anyway, someone probably deserves a “Thank you” for that decision.
Why not just have Bahirwani pay them off with Kumar’s credit card? That’d be so much quicker.
What’s the bet these people receiving “exit payments” are just the AISPA people who paid off Khosla being “reimbursed”?
It all makes sense now.
ha ha ha norway, don’t indulge in wishful thinking. my ‘gag ‘ is temporary and i can return with my ‘infestation’ any time soon, so BEWARE !
get real soapbox. exit payments are being received in different parts of the country. all AISPA payees are from Mumbai itself .
Y’huh.
Maybe you’ll can take SpeakAsia stuff back to its own topic? 😀
These AISPA peoples are fooling the innocent panelists. This Exit Option payments exist only in our imagination. Till today none of my acquaintance has claimed to receive any such payment, infact I am too waiting for my exit payment.
AISPA is creating and publishing these fake payment proofs in their website and also sharing the same on mobi club site. It’s more than 4 months now, since they started this Exit payment process but till today they couldn’t even start this 1st batch exit payments.
So, what’s could be the chance of 2nd Batch? ZERO. I can bet upon that the proofs being uploaded on AISPA and Mobi Club site are 100% fake and are being created for misguiding purpose only.
Exit Payment News is just a fake activity. These AISPA leaders should be arrested and punished for their crimes.
Wow! 13 posts today and counting!
Speak Asia shut itself down on 11.05.2012 when it claimed to have clients and actually gave a fraudulent client list. I only brought SAOL to face the music after the shut down.
I am happy to note that my role is appreciated by neutral observers who are experts in MLMs and fraudulent MLMs.
I fought with SAOL and forced them to issue me invoices for the investment of my company in its fraudulent survey scheme. It also resulted in SAOL paying Rs. 54.0 crore (USD 9.8 million) initially as service tax to the Government of India. I believe the tax liability may be about Rs. 280 crore (USD 51.0 million).
I requested for a refund of my company’s investment in the survey scheme but it was scoffed at by the upline. Then I filed the FIR which got the ringleaders arrested and no further investment was possible thereafter in the survey scheme. No innocents were butchered thereafter in this survey scheme thereafter.
On 10.05.2012 I got the stay in CrWP 3611 in the Bombay High Court vacated in the Supreme Court in the face of zero support from eighteen advocates including senior advocates. I did not return to the Supreme Court as I was threatened and in any case I had done what needed to be done.
On 15.03.2012 the Public Prosecutor had falsely stated that an application against the stay had been filed in the Supreme Court and would be heard on 22.03.2012.
No application was filed in the Supreme Court and the PP retired soon after. SAOL was able to enjoy the stay only because of the State of Maharashtra not challenging it in the Supreme Court.
Was this a win win situation for the remaining parties after my departure from CrWP 3611/2011?
I produced the power of attorney executed by SAOL in favour of Ashish Dandekar for filing a Rs. 500 crore defamation case against Star TV. Ashish Dandekar’s plea of being a simple sales executive was rejected by the Court in the bail hearings and he suffered as a consequence of this.
The Police should register FIRs in all complaints against the upline and SAOL as clarified by the High Court in its order dated 09.01.13. if this comes through Manoj Kumar may be able to beat Bernard Madoff’s record of 150 years jail term for offences pertaining to a fraudulent Ponzi scheme.
…… will continue after dinner
@anju
Don’t you people know anything about Manoj running other scams like Ourfreephone, Mango universe, Sevenrings edu. pvt. ltd. etc.? Either you are ignorant or stupid.
neither. ask your friends to file their chargesheet, and then they can properly take DOWN the company at trial. or is the high court order correct in pointing towards collusion with the company ???
anyways i’m currently following the herbalife debate which has vast implications for networking as a whole. so you can carry on your repetitive conversations all by yourself.
see ya later alligator !
Neither ignorant or stupid but just street smart! Nobody kicks their food bucket!
They only say Jai Speak Asia! And let the world take a walk! Also the ordinary investor in the fraudulent online survey scheme of SAOL.
The Bombay High Court has also said the same but in a different way!
@anju
Why you people are lying to all the panelists through AISPA? Where you claim Speakasia is genuine and request them not to file any FIR, trust the company and telling Speakasia will restart etc.?
On the other hand your husband claims in Mumbai HC that he is a “victim of the designs of the Company”. You can be a supporter of such scheme and can be involved with or you can be a victim, but you can’t be both a victim and a supporter.
In any case there is some information that can be verified easily by you for truth. Like following names can be verified on government record CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION U 29301 MH 2003 PTC 143206 at ROC Mumbai. Why AISPA does not verify or confirm something like that if AISPA actually cares about panelists?
Now you are claiming that exit payments has started but …
Just look at the exit payment site speakasiamarketing(.)com. It is not operational.
Following are the marketing updates that claims Speakasia doesn’t have the database, admin rights, or Govt. permissions to start the exit option (Which is not mentioned in any court order up to now) then suddenly how can Speakasia start exit option (test) payments? How can Speakasia modify their website?
Unless Speakasia is lying about everything.
speakasiaonline(.)com/services/ was modified before 19/10/2012 (without getting admin rights from EOW) as you can see form following Mobi Club update.
www(.)speakasiaonline(.)mobi/2012/10/19/speakasias-exit-option-application/
show me one AISPA update which says ‘please don’t file FIR’s ‘. we may say ‘have faith ,trust the company’ but never advice about the filing of complaints.
AISPA updates are cleared by the legal team, nobody’s crazy here. the rest of your post is regurgitated nonsense . we’re well beyond this kind of nonsense now.
get this in your head. the EOW is investigating speakasia not any mango or banana. that is irrelevant nonsense.
the question of server control being with EOW is old hat and even the supreme court and the high court was told this repeatedly. why do you think mediation was set up with EOW if not for the database? and if anything was modified without EOW permission they would have brought it up in court.
they’ve got the whole cyber cell behind them. speakasia is not certifiably MAD to fidget with the site or server while it’s controls are with EOW.
and if the payment proofs are fake the EOW can easily prove it in court. why are you worrying about it?
So what were you saying?
Manoj Kumar, Rajiv Mehrotra, Kunal Pathak and many more people from Speakasia were also working with other scams in past like AdMatrix, Mango Universe and more and you people think that is irrelevant.
If EOW can prove something or not it’s another matter but nobody proved that Speakasia is a real company. Speakasia even failed in different courts to convince it was a real business.
And you dodged the following topic.
Yes Mr. Andy you are right, Mr. Bahirwani is a hired gun of Speakasia. He and other AISPA members are deeply involved in this Scam.
These peoples (Senior panelists and Franchisee holders) were the leading promoters of this scam and they have made millions from this scam and when this Ponzi scheme pyramid collapsed then they suddenly created this so called association AISPA to protect themselves from the Law and they also succeeded in that by gaining panelists trust and support.
See, there are lots of poor peoples out there, who still believe these cheaters blindly but what have they done till date for the benefits of the panelists.
This is apparent here that Mr. Bahirwani has successfully played a double game, right from the beginning he has been misguiding the panelists to support Speaksia and also mislead them to protest against EOW, Govt. agencies and Media But when the time came for his own interrogation, then he suddenly changed his statement by claiming himself as a VICTIM panelist.
How is that possible? How come a biggest supporter suddenly turned into an aggrieved victim investor? In court he is a Victim and in outside he is one of the biggest supporter of Speakasia. How can he be both a supporter and as well as a victim. Isn’t it disgusting?
This is the permanent strategy of AISPA to point their fingers towards EOW as an Enemy of the Company. But I can’t understand why EOW he is blamed for all this mishappening. It’s Speakasia who cheated the peoples, stopped the payments and still it is not willing to payback.
Why EOW is blamed for money? Do they have our money? What liability do the EOW owe us? It’s the liability of the Speakasia to return the money of the investors who are seeking Exit from their ponzi scheme. EOW owe us nothing and they are just doing their duty by investigation.
The investigation wouldn’t be finished unless the masterminds of this Scam gets arrested and we all know that Mr. Manoj Kumar and Haren kaur has already fled from India 2 years back. So, it means, the investigation would never get completed completely.
Few days back, on Aaj Tak News channel, EOW has confirmed that AISPA is fooling the peoples by uploading Fake Payment Proofs on their website and they have also cleared that neither Speakasia has got any such permission nor they are executing any such Exit option.
Exit Option is just a fake imaginary activity which is being spread by AISPA peoples and it is cleared from EOW’s statement that Speakasia doesn’t exist anymore and these AISPA peoples are again playing with the emotions of the poor peoples.
I am damn sure if this Exit payment issue wouldn’t get solved very soon then these AISPA peoples might have to face a strong physical violence against them and this will happen very soon. These cheaters will be punished either legally or brutally but they will be punished either way and that’s for sure.
Yes Ashok Bahirwani can’t claim himself as a victim. He is telling people not to file FIR against Speakasia.
Why Uncle 420 is opposing arrest?
Friends before a year we all were thinking that our beloved company SpeakAsia will start soon and Uncle 420 was also telling the same in his update and we believed him thinking he will help us. After some times it looks like he is not what he appear.
As we know many of SpeakAsia’s officiers including our “Dabaang” CEO Tarak Sir was arrested and after interogation he and others were released on bail.
All these people have co operated with EOW and other goverment procedures. Than why Uncle 420 is opposing arrest? Why he is always trying to stall the investigation or other settlement procedures?
There is a shocking truth behind this. This Uncle 420 and his wife with some of his friends learned how SpeakAsia is going to change the consumer market in India. They geathered so much information about the company’s business ideas with the help of the lawyer A. Abbdi.
After that they tried to prolong or delay the company’s efforts to restart it’s operation even interfearing in a Civil case 383 in Supreme court. In this way Uncle 420 and his friends are planning to blackmail the company so that they can ask for money from the company.
Friends tell me one thing what AISPA has achieved after it was formed before a year? What Uncle 420 has done for the SpeakAsia or SpeakAsian?
Friends please refer to the post of Krashna Arjun for more information.
/facepalm. Speak Asia was a simple Ponzi scheme, nothing more nothing less.
“Going to change the consumer market” was unsuccessfully tried in Brazil, with one of Manoj Kumar’s other Ponzi schemes “Mister Colibri”. It didn’t work very well there, so I don’t believe it will work in India either.
If you want to know how the “Empowering Consumers” idea will work, you can simply look at Mister Colibri in Brazil. It failed within few months.
Don’t you find it is amazing that this Uncle 420 started representing SpeakAsia without any authority?
First he with his wife and friends formed and association, themselves elected president, secretory (himself) etc. and claimed they represent all the SpeakAsians.
I don’t have any information regarding how many members are there in so called association and how many of them are panelists.
The most important question for us, on whose authority he is giving statements on behalf of the company? Even filing various court cases without any permission of SpeakAsia and delaying the whole process.
Mr. Abdi (the lawyer) has been Manoj Kumar’s lawyer for many years, in several companies. So they’re sharing the same lawyer. Uncle 420’s authority probably comes directly from the top, but his authority seems to be limited in several ways.
SpeakAsia wasn’t exactly a real company. It was set up to LOOK like one, but it wasn’t organised like a company. It was more similar to a caporegime (mafia), or the Japanese variation of a caporegime. 🙂
AISPA
I’ll guess AISPA has/had 600-1200 members. It has never been very popular among ordinary panelists. My guessing is based on estimates from …
a. its first ‘general assembly’ (when the association was formally founded in 2012), using Google to check the size of the buildings where they held the meeting.
b. the general lack of interest I have seen among panelists, in the first few weeks after the ‘general assembly’.
c. all the vague answers from anjali, she avoided almost every question about the number of members.
600-1200 members is probably close enough for an estimate.
Mr.Bahirwani is only protecting his liberty as he is entitled as per law. Everybody has a right to defend himself and this has been provided in our constitution.
It is a matter of record that Mr. Bahirwani has presented himself on various occasions before the EOW for investigation. The EOW wants to arrest Mr. Bahirwani only due to the personal vindictiveness against him.
All persons arrested in the Speakasia matter till date have been picked up by surprise without having the opportunity to protect themselves or apply for Anticipatory Bail, if they had a choice every person would have chosen to apply for Anticipatory Bail.
As explained above Mr. Bahirwani is not stalling investigation, he is only defending himself as per law and as per his rights as enshrined in the Constitution of India.
AISPA had to intervene in WP/383/2011 only to seek clarification from the SC, as ordered by Bombay HC on 16th August, 2012: http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/generatenew.php?path=./data/criminal/2012/&fname=WP361111160812.pdf&smflag=N
You will see Mr. Vikas Mahajan that your contention is baseless and faulty.
To understand what AISPA has achieved you will have to first understand the OBJECTIVE of AISPA which is: To protect the rights of the Panelists and to safeguard their money.
AISPA has successfully united all the panelists together and kept them informed of the current scenario regularly. We believe that the present EXIT PAYMENTS are also the result of the efforts of AISPA.
Mr. Bahirwani is only representing AISPA of which he is an elected Secretary. He is no way representing Speakasia.
Till date neither Mr. Bahirwani nor Team AISPA have given any statement on behalf of the Company. No permission is required from Speakasia for AISPA to file any court case. AISPA is an independent organisation formed and created for the objectives listed above.
We all know that you are not Vikas Mahajan, we know that you have some sinister plan to tarnish his name and image. You have proved to be a coward hiding behind false assumed identity
Now this is funny. If some one wants to ask questions, he should use his own id or a fake name but not a popular speakasia loyalist name to post anti-SAOL comments. Shame on you “FAKE VIKAS MAHAJAN”.
Have guts to come forward with your real name or a unique ID like OZ. When we are true, we always have replies available. And Truth never needs arguments.
@Sanjeev Khanna
Have guts to come forward with your real name or a unique ID like OZ. When we are true, we always have replies available. And Truth never needs arguments.
I agree with you Mr. Sanjeev Khanna and I await your verifiable contacts – phone no., email ID and address. I would also like to know the nature and tenure of your association with Speak Asia.
how to file FIR regarding exit payment?
this is my mail id (Ozedit: email address removed)
FIR is a First Information Report, a police report used for investigation and prosecution of a cognizable offence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Information_Report
How to file a FIR can be found under “External links” in Wikipedia.
Navniit Kkhosla filed FIR 153 against some central leaders of SpeakAsia in 2011, later renumbered to FIR 60. Nearly all the court cases have been related to FIR 60, and to two other FIRs filed in other districts or states.
FIRs are typically filed by “victims of a crime” or by anyone else on behalf of the victims of a crime.
The EXIT option is about something else, about a voluntarily solution SpeakAsia wanted to try in September 2011, to return money to some victims if the company was allowed to continue. It has FAILED, but they’re probably paying a few people anyway.
thanks for reply. what u said every thing correct but the exit payment proof seems fake and mob club saying that 2nd batch exit payment started and fake proofs also uploaded.
I called Chennai head of speak Asia Mr vijaybaski and sent the details of mine for 2batch of exit payment but he received me mind and I am following more than 6months I asked regarding 2nd batch of exit payment.
he told that still now 2nd batch exit payment not started so I decide to process via legal like Navniit Kkhosla
(Ozedit: email removed)
due to speak Asia. I am paying interest for invested amount. I am not paid credit card Bill so they sent me legal notice for me.
now shall I send legal notice to speak Asia to get exit payment and due to speak Asia only I faced lot of problems financialy and other. please suggest me
I haven’t seen any of the proofs.
In MLM and network marketing, “proofs” are usually used to mislead people. They are normally used to trick people into believing something. 🙂
Navniit Kkhosla is “First Informant” for FIR 60. His contact info is stated in post #1. He has become experienced in how the system works during this case.
Navniit Kkhosla received his money back from AISPA / Bahirwani and other Senior Panelists in March 2012, through a SETTLEMENT with the other party. NOTE: He received money from Senior Panelists rather than from SpeakAsia, so a similar method won’t work for anyone else. But he’s the only one who has received any money.
My suggestion:
I don’t believe the idea of filing multiple FIRs all over India will work very well, but I don’t have any better ideas.
You should CHECK that solution, but I don’t think you should use it right now.
The discussion about “What to do?” is more active in another thread (linking to one of the last posts there):