On the heels of MetaMask flagging DAO1 back in July, Xova has been launched.

Xova operates from the website domain “xovawallet.com”, privately registered on August 22nd, 2025.

No ownership details are provided on Xova’s website. If we visit Xova’s Google Play Store app page however, we learn the app was developed by Swed Schield AG:

Swed Schield AG is a Swiss company that was registered in 2023. Leon Filipovic, cited as a resident of Zagreb, Croatia, was appointed Swed Schield’s sole Director in January 2025.

Filipovic (right) is a long-time business partner of Josip Heit’s. Filipovic’s name has popped up in connection with a string of shell companies, as well as companies directly tied to GSPartners.

GSPartners is the predecessor of DAO1. The same fraudulent investment scheme GSPartners offered through its G999 token, DAO1 now offers through Apertum Foundation’s APTM token.

GSPartners, G999, DAO1 and Apertum Foundation are all owned and operated by Josip Heit. With Filipovic the sole Director of the shell company attached to Xova, it follows Heit is also behind Xova.

This tracks with DAO1 integration within Xova’s offered non-custodial crypto wallets.

So why does DAO1 need an internal wallet platform? And why isn’t the connection between Xova, DAO1 and Apertum Foundation openly disclosed?

MetaMask flagged DAO1 as potentially deceptive:

At the time New Zealand, Australia and Texas (set aside in August), had all issued DAO1 and/or Apertum Foundation fraud warnings.

It’s unknown if other wallet platforms had flagged DAO1, but it was apparently evident the scheme risked other wallet platforms also blocking it.

And so Xova launched about a month ago. The first Xova marketing video went up on an Apertum Foundation associated YouTube channel on October 2nd, 2025.

As to why Xova doesn’t disclose common ownership between itself, DAO1 and Apertum Foundation on its website, this is likely due to DAO1 continuing to attract the attention of financial regulators:

Xova is currently offered as an app through the Google Play Store, Chrome Web Store and Apple App Store.

Given the apparent obfuscation, it’s unclear whether the platforms are aware of Xova’s ties to DAO1, Apertum Foundation and Heit.

Google and Apple are of course US companies, and the DAO1 investment scheme, at least officially, isn’t available to North American residents.

This is a decision by owner Josip Heit, amid ongoing GSPartners fraud settlement negotiations with North American regulators still playing out.

Earlier today Apertum Foundation published an AI robodubbed video to its “SportsFuture” channel, promising GSPartners G999 bagholders, the majority of whom are US and Canadian residents, a way to convert G999 to USDT.

Instead of just allowing G999 bagholders to finally cash out through DAO1, yet another new platform has been launched; OpenPlaza.

OpenPlaza’s website domain (“openplaza.io”), was privately registered on May 29th, 2025.

As represented in the previously cited Apertum Foundation marketing video, in order to cash out G999 bagholders must convert their tokens to WG999 through OpenPlaza.

WG999 is an Apertum Foundation token. Once the G999 –> WG999 conversion is done, WG999 must then be converted to WUSDT, yet another Apertum Foundation token.

Finally, WUSDT is exchanged for USDT – but it’s unclear who will be funding G999 bagholder withdrawals.

Seeing as Heit has reduced internal 24-hour APTM pump trading volume from $9.5 million to around $800,000 since August, it’s unlikely to be DAO1/Apertum Foundation itself.

No doubt somewhere along the line there’s going to be the expectation that WUSDT is rolled into DAO1’s fraudulent investment scheme.

Like DAO1, Open Plaza is purportedly blocking G999 cashing out by North American residents.

Obviously we know Josip Heit is running Open Plaza as yet another layer to the DAO1 fraudulent investment scheme, but blocking US residents is a bit odd considering Open Plaza’s “decentralized” marketing charade:

OpenPlaza is the premier NFT marketplace on the Apertum Blockchain, allowing users to create collections, mint and trade unique digital assets in a secure decentralized environment.

The same paradox has existed within DAO1 since launch in early 2025, so this is of course nothing new.

The bottom line is if any of this was legal, there’d be no need to block North American residents from DAO1 and anything else attached.

DAO1 and Apertum Foundation looking to resurrect G999 is likely due to a lack of new DAO1 investors tanking APTM’s public trading value.

The goal is to get G999 bagholders outside of the US to, ultimately, feed their monopoly money tokens into DAO1 and become APTM bagholders.

Whether Open Plaza temporarily pumps APTM from its current death spiral remains to be seen.