BitClub Network’s Joby Weeks has tested positive for cocaine.

Citing Weeks’ drug habit and other violations, the DOJ has pushed back on Weeks’ requests for relaxed release conditions.

Week (right) has been and continues to flood the BitClub Network case docket with motions and letters to the court each week.

A recurring theme in Weeks’ motions and letters is the relaxation of his conditions. In response to some of Weeks’ motions and letters, the DOJ filed an opposition response on August 12th.

Weeks’ current release conditions see him residing in Florida with new wife Dasha Weeks. Weeks is subject to home incarceration with location monitoring and “stringent restrictions on his access to and use of any sort of internet-connected device”.

These conditions were ordered at a May 20th, 2025 hearing. Two days after that hearing, Weeks tested positive for cocaine.

Just two days after the Hearing, Weeks tested positive for cocaine in the Southern District of Florida.

Testing positive for cocaine is a violation of Weeks’ release conditions. In addition to failing a drug test, the DOJ cites an additional four alleged violations of Weeks’ release conditions.

In July 2025 Pretrial Services conducted an unannounced visit to Weeks’ residence.

Weeks’ wife and nanny claimed that Weeks was in the shower, so the officer stood outside to wait. While outside, the officer saw Weeks exiting a private elevator to his residence.

Weeks is not permitted to leave his residence.

In addition, according to location monitoring reports, Weeks appeared to be at the pool and beach areas of his apartment complex for between 30-45 minutes on July 26, July 29, and July 30, in clear violation of his condition of home incarceration.

Not being able to use on-site facilities might sound a bit harsh but the DOJ argues these are conditions Weeks subjected himself to.

The elimination of access to outdoor areas is not the result of a Court imposed restriction, but rather the result of Weeks’ own request to relocate from Colorado to Florida.

Weeks requested permission during the Hearing to relocate to an apartment complex in Florida in order to live with his wife and child.

However, due to the condition of home incarceration, Weeks is restricted to his personal apartment, and this condition does not extend to the apartment complex’s outdoor facilities.

In one of his weekly docket flood letters, Weeks has since requested his release conditions be modified to include complex facilities. The DOJ has opposed the request on the grounds of “Week’s continued [release] violations”.

The DOJ also also puts forth that Weeks’ wife, Dasha Weeks, violated her custodial duties by lying to Pretrial Services.

These violations, and especially the violation on July 23, 2025, highlight that Weeks’ third-party custodian, Dasha Weeks, cannot be trusted to continue in that role.

Ms. Weeks [sic] agreed to serve as a third-party custodian to ensure Weeks’ compliance with his pretrial conditions, and therefore, each time that Weeks left the apartment, Ms. Weeks was under an obligation to report that violation and failed to do so.

Most concerningly, on July 23, when explicitly asked about Weeks’ location, Ms. Weeks lied to the Pretrial Officer conducting the home visit.

In support of their position that Weeks’ bail should be revoked (sending him back to prison), the DOJ emphasises this isn’t the first time Dasha violating her custodial duties.

This is not the first time that the Court has been forced to question Ms. Weeks’ ability to serve as a thirdparty custodian.

In fact, during the Hearing, Your Honor specifically admonished Dasha Weeks, calling her communications to Pretrial Services in Colorado “unacceptable” and stating that the communications “actually caused [Your Honor] to reconsider [the] ruling [ ] if only in want of a responsible third party.”

Your Honor made clear during the Hearing that “Mr. Weeks’ continued release on bail is co-extensive with the cooperation of his third-party custodians” and warned that if “Weeks does not have third-party custodians in whom the Court and Pretrial Services can repose its trust to carry out the conditions that the Court has set, that the Court will have no choice but to revoke Mr. Weeks’ bail for want of a responsible third-party custodian.”

In conclusion, the DOJ states;

It is clear that Weeks does not intend to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release and will continue to deceive Pretrial Services unless and until his bail is revoked and he is in custody.

Weeks has confirmed that the location monitoring violations were not the result of a misunderstanding of the Court’s decision at the Hearing. By Weeks’ own admission, he disagrees with the conditions set by this Court and has decided that he does not need to abide by them.

The response to blatant, intentional, and repeated violations of the most basic conditions cannot be to reward this behavior by modifying the very conditions that Weeks chooses to ignore.

The Government has no option but to move to revoke Weeks’ bail.

Based on the foregoing, the Court should revoke Weeks’ bail and order him detained pending sentencing in this matter.

At time of publication the court has yet to issue a ruling on Weeks’ latest request to modify his release conditions.

Weeks’ sentencing was scheduled for March 2025 but there have been no public updates since.