On June 25th Plaintiff Ogale Erandal Ray (aka Randy Ray), filed a “show cause” motion seeking an order holding defendant Kevin Giguere in contempt.

Ray alleges Giguere has engaged in witness tampering, including but not limited to a murder threat.

On June 20th, 2025 Plaintiff and Jeunesse co-founder Ogale Erandal Ray (aka Randy Ray), filed a notice voluntarily dismissing Jason Borne and his company Allebas AES LLC as defendants.

Borne and Allebas AES LLC were named defendants in a lawsuit filed last October. In the suit Ray accuses Kevin Giguere of heading up a syndicate (the “Kingpin Defendants”), which Ray claims defrauded him out of millions of dollars.

Ray accused Borne of receiving bogus Jeunesse payments through Allebas AES. At the alleged direction of Giguere, Borne forwarded “the majority of funds” he received to “Giguere and others”.

Borne’s and Allebas AES’ dismissal from Ray’s case appears to be a result of evidentiary cooperation.

Since the filing of Mr. Ray’s lawsuit, Mr. Ray has obtained corroborating evidence, from more than one witness/defendant, that establishes the scheme perpetuated by the Kingpin Defendants.

One such witness is Mr. Jason Borne (“Mr. Borne”) who owned Network Defendant Allebas AES LLC (“Allebas”).

Mr. Borne provided the Plaintiff a host of corroborating evidence detailing the scope of the Kingpin Defendants’ scheme, including payment transactions and instructions, historic communications with other defendants, and a video recording captured by Mr. Giguere that Mr. Giguere subsequently sent to Mr. Borne after the filing of Mr. Ray’s lawsuit (the “Video”).

Importantly, the Video underscores and corroborates Mr. Ray’s allegations and is a damaging piece of evidence to the Kingpin Defendants.

Pending clarification on admissibility of “the video”, no specifics on its contents have been made public.

As part of efforts to establish admissibility of “the video”, Ray’s counsel contacted Giguere’s counsel on June 20th.

On June 23rd Giguere’s counsel informed Ray’s counsel ” he would speak to his side and follow-up accordingly.”

The same day Ray’s counsel called Giguere’s counsel about “the video”, Giguere began calling Borne directly.

Between June 20th and June 23rd, Giguere is accused of calling Borne nineteen times.

Mr. Borne, who was on vacation with his family during that time, tried to resist Mr. Giguere’s calls until they became so repetitive and harassing that he answered Mr. Giguere’s call.

On June 23, 2025, when Mr. Borne answered Mr. Giguere’s call, Mr. Giguere, having apparently learned of undersigned’s knowledge of the Video, then proceeded to yell, demean, and physically threaten Mr. Borne. In fact, the conversation culminated in Mr. Giguere threatening Mr. Borne.

In a sworn declaration in the possession of Ray’s counsel, Borne claims;

On June 23, 2025, Mr. Giguere told me that providing the video to Mr. Ray for use in his lawsuit against Mr. Giguere and the other defendants, would be ‘the sort of thing that would make people murder’ me.

Whether any recordings of Giguere’s alleged threats exist is unclear.

Immediately after being threatened with murder, Borne called his attorney. This resulted in an email sent to Giguere’s counsel,

insisting Mr. Giguere cease and desist his unlawful murder threats and witness tampering behavior.

Ray’s contempt order motion notes

it is a third-degree felony for a person to knowingly use intimidation or physical force, with the intent to cause or induce any person to:

(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document or other object, from an official noncriminal investigation or official noncriminal proceeding; or

(ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the integrity or availability of the object for use in an official noncriminal investigation or official noncriminal proceeding.

Mr. Giguere’s conduct, unless stopped by this Court, sends a clear message to other witnesses/defendants that they too will be subject to threats of violence and intimidation if they elect to cooperate with Mr. Ray and resolve their individual claims.

At time of publication the court has yet to issue a ruling on Ray’s motion.

I’m not sure if Giguere can reply to the motion before the court issues a ruling, but either way no response has been filed.