Why Traffic Monsoon will lose the preliminary injunction hearing
OPINION: On September 23rd the SEC, Traffic Monsoon and Charles Scoville will face off in court.
The issue at hand is whether a preliminary injunction should be granted against Traffic Monsoon and Scoville, effectively ending Traffic Monsoon and Scoville’s marketing career.
Aside from the usual rhetoric from angry investors who still haven’t realized they’ve been had, little has come out of camp Scoville over the last week.
In an update published a few hours ago, Scoville has revealed the core of his case come September 23rd.
Scoville’s update, published 14 hours ago to Facebook, is thus:
People are asking for an update. Well, the Preliminary Injunction isn’t until the 23 of Sept.
I will just say this though. My attorney is very clear what a ponzi is. Ponzi is where someone says invest with them and they’ll give you some sort of return.
The problem?
What you say doesn’t matter, it’s what you do that counts.
More specifically in the case of Traffic Monsoon, the solicitation of a $50 investment on the implied promise of a $55 ROI. That ROI was paid out of subsequently invested funds, making Traffic Monsoon a Ponzi scheme.
Scoville could have referred to Traffic Monsoon as a fast-food restaurant, a used car dealership, a cinema… it doesn’t mater. Neither does it matter if the returns were guaranteed, or what else was attached to affiliate investments (ad credits).
All that matters is the business model ($50 in, $55 out), which the SEC will nail Traffic Monsoon and Scoville for on September 23rd.
We’re currently nine days out now, so expect Traffic Monsoon pseudo-compliance rhetoric to ramp up over the next week and a bit.
Stay tuned…
…and that right there is what gets me about Cheatin’ Chas; he keeps bleating on over again and again how TM is NOT an investment and they don’t sell investment securities and his customers are not investors and blah blah blah – NONE OF THAT makes a friggin’ iota of difference because wording something to your own perceived definition is not the same as what that thing actually IS.
Just like with all these deluded numpties that keep referring to themselves as ‘entrepreneurs’ when they wouldn’t know what anything truly entrepreneurial is if it crawled up their kneecaps.
I also keep seeing him bang on about how the return of $55 was never ‘promised’?
Oh really, Chuckles?
REALLY?
That’s funny ‘cos if my memory serves, back in Ad (s)Hit Profits which is / was the EXACT same Ponzi, sorry I mean ‘business’ model, you absolutely 100% promised the same thing and that’s why I joined along with a lot of other people at the time back in 2013.
And then on that magical day when we logged in to find all our balances, some with actual real money involved (I stuck in about $700), all but vanished into thin air.
Scovillain’s eggscuse? “Hackers” made off with the funds.
Oh some dirty criminal(s) made off with our money alright and that criminal was unquestionably, irrefutably and I would even now say demonstrably YOU. And you’ve been doing that exact same con for years in all of your previous programs that ALSO have the exact same scamming model.
Only this time, you got too big and too greedy for your lil’ booties and it was only ever a matter of time before the wheels came careering off and the whole rotten scheme imploded (or exploded depending on your definition).
If there is a more duplicitous, back-peddling, snivelling rectal smear on the ass end of humanity than Charles Scoville, then quite frankly, I do not want to know about it.
All I know is, Butterkist sales are going to go through the roof on here and Realscam over the coming weeks.
One is most definitely staying tuned for this ongoing soap opera…
right!
so i’ll just mention sunil patel, who is a definite back peddler and showing great promise of becoming a rectal smear [on the ass end of humanity], anytime now.
he started out by saying he would go to utah to testify for TM and scoville, but he back pedaled on that saying there was a death in his family and he would be in mourning and going offline for 30 days.
now he has back pedaled on staying offline for 30 days too! he’s back on FB yakking about testimonials and saying deep stuff like:
but what is he finishing?
i hope he’s not ‘finishing’ his fight for TM because he had declared that he would fight till his ‘last breath’.
looks like he’ll be backpedaling on this too, and then his ambition of becoming a rectal smear [on the ass end of humanity and all alien life combined!] will finally be fulfilled.
Oh he’s up there (down there) with Scovillain alright, but for me PERSONALLY, I had to endure that nasally-voiced tw@ back in AHP a few years ago pathetically bleating on just like he does now, day in and day out with excuse after lie after more bullshit.
And now after just seeing the latest update@the court hearing being delayed……well, at least we can laugh at those who already booked air fare tickets, especially if they can’t get refunded at such short notice *snak snak
I’ll give Chuckles and co this much; they’re certainly giving us plenty of drama and hijinks to be entertained with for sure.
I have watched this stuff day in day out now for months, what I can’t get my head around is the fact he has been getting away with this stuff for a very long time, and must be very well off from it, or has blow it on the high life.
And another thing is a lot of people know what he is like taking money and holding on to it, and they still go back to his scams, and still back him up.
And another thing is, all his family are all in on this to. Who’s to say they can’t run so called business like this in the future, it’s seems to me that this will go on and on, there is to many of them, and all he has to do is train them as he is very good at what he dose, and what he’s done.
The problem is with fraudsters like this, they can’t stop. It became the ONLY thing they can do ‘well’ in.
Just look at Kevin Trudeau… check kiting, credit card and identity fraud… it only got bigger and bigger.
A few hundred? A few thousand? Try a couple million, tens of millions. And they NEVER learn what they did was wrong. It’s always someone else’s fault.
Why did bank had to be so nasty with his credit card and “forced” him into kiting checks and steal identity to open credit cards.
When he did MLM he hired his former prison buddies. When everybody else sold MLM normally he made outrageous promises that costed company tens of thousands to shore up to boost his “sales”.
Then he went to promote his own crap on infomercials making equally bogus promises. When FTC caught him he just shifted laterally because FTC can’t do anything about books (2nd amendment), but FTC eventually got him on something else. And judge threw the book at him when he tried to play number games.
Scoville is just a tyke compared to Trudeau’s fraud for decades.
First of all friends..when SEC did lose cases in the past they never appealed.
2. It pretty hard to prove something is a return…When clearly the model does not say that from the beginning…
SEC have already let go and admitted that…the only issue for them is that this is a security….well again the terms dont say that from the onset…
so dont get too excited haters…lets see TM DOES have brilliant lawyers .so its not going to be straight forward for SEC…
Oh dear. You’ve obviously been reading those Scoville novels…
The SEC have never lost a Ponzi securities case. The Securities and Exchange Act was effected in 1933, the law is established – ditto what is and isn’t a security.
About as “hard” as understanding $50 in, $55 out.
That’s a $5 ROI, basic math.
Calling a duck an red-bellied snake doesn’t make it so.
The SEC acknowledged that Scoville misrepresented his fraudulent investment scheme as an advertising service with no attached investment opportunity. Nothing more.
Again, what you call a security doesn’t make it any less of one.
Has been so far. What, you think your ad-credit Ponzi is special? AdSurfDaily, bitch.