Jeunesse co-founder Ogale Erandal Ray (aka Randy Ray), has accused defendant Kevin Giguere of witness tampering for a second time.

Ray filed suit in 2024, accusing Giguere and several co-conspirators of cheating him out of tens of millions.

In mid 2025, Ray filed a motion accusing Giguere of threatening a witness with murder. I don’t recall having yet seen an order on that motion.

Nonetheless on December 29th, Ray filed a second motion seeking to hold Giguere in contempt.

In his latest motion Ray accuses Giguere, in violation of court orders, of continued witness interference. This time Ray claims Giguere tainted his son and daughter in law.

From Ray’s motion;

Subsequent to the filing of this lawsuit, [Ray] discovered that non-party Mrs. Dakota Giguere (“Dakota”) received over a million dollars under the conspiracy outlined in the Complaint.

Dakota is Mr. Giguere’s daughter-in-law and is married to Mr. Giguere’s son, Austin Giguere (“Austin”).

Austin, also, independently, received over a million dollars as a part of the conspiracy. Both were used as straw people to launder money for Mr. Giguere.

Ray attempted to effect service on Austin and Dakota for depositions on the alleged payments, which is where the troubles began.

[Ray] issued a Subpoena Duces Tecum to be served on Dakota, who remains a non-party

However, it became immediately evident that Dakota and Austin were actively evading service.

Indeed, the process server captured Dakota and Austin’s evasion on body camera footage and is available for the Court’s review.

The video shows Austin and Dakota ignoring the process server who is simply trying to hand them subpoena paper; the Process server calls them both by name and they continue walking without any attempt to interact with the process server.

In all, the process server attempted to serve Dakota with the Subpoena on five occasions: October 25, October 27th, October 28th, November 1, and finally on November 3, 2025.

Ultimately, service was effectuated on November 3, 2025 while the process server was in front of Dakota and Austin’s apartment unit, but again without Austin and Dakota making any effort to acknowledge the process server:

Dakota and Austin walked out of the elevator with a cart. They brought the cart in front of their unit. [The process server] explained to Dakota that [he] had court papers for service for her and that [he] was going to leave them in the cart.

[Building security] witnessed it and [the process server] took photos of [Dakota and Austin] and drop-served the papers in their cart they left in front of the unit.

Austin Giguere was finally deposed on December 4th, 2025. At the deposition, Austin was “asked about the evasion of service”.

Q: Has your father [Kevin Giguere] told you to ignore a process server if he approached you on a sidewalk?

A: Yes.

Q: and when did your father tell you that?

A: I don’t know.

Q: Did he tell you that over the telephone or in a conversation in person?

A: Over the phone.

Q: And why did he tell you to do that?

A: I don’t know.

Q: Did your father also tell your wife [Dakota] to ignore a process server if he approached on a sidewalk?

A: No.

Q: He only gave that information to you?

A: Yes.

Q: And then did you tell your wife that your dad said to ignore process servers if they try to serve process on her?

A: Yes.

…

Q: So you’re certain she [Dakota] heard your instructions that you relayed from your father?

A: Yes.

…

Q: When the process server eventually did get service on your wife, did you tell your father?

A: Yes.

Q: Was he upset with you that process had successfully been served?

A: Yes.

Dakota Giguere, aka Dakota Rae, was deposed on December 5th and faced a similar line of questioning.

Q: Had your father-in-law [Mr. Giguere] told you to ignore a process server if the process server came up to you on the sidewalk?

A: Yeah – well, he didn’t – well, Kevin didn’t. Austin told me.

Q: Okay. And what did Austin say about that?

A: He just said Kevin said.

Q: He said Kevin said what?

A: To just keep walking if anyone comes up to you guys.

…

Q: Did Austin tell you that if a process server comes up to you my dad says ignore him, just keep walking?

A: I don’t remember the exact terminology.

Q: Was that the message that was conveyed to you even if the words were different?

A: No.

Q: So if your husband said that yesterday in his deposition, would that have been false?

A: It’s possible. We remember things different.

Citing a previous court order explicitly instructing Kevin Giguere “not to communicate with co-defendants or witnesses about their
potential cooperation”, Ray’s motion concludes;

Mr. Giguere has shown a pattern of willful disregard for the integrity of the judicial process and this Court’s role in administering a fair litigation. Rather, Mr. Giguere has taken it into his own hands to ensure witnesses are afraid to:

(i) cooperate; (ii) provide truthful testimony; and (iii) provide evidence regarding Mr. Ray’s allegations and Mr. Giguere’s liability.

Mr. Giguere’s egregious conduct, especially at the inception of this complex fraud case, should not be countenanced by the Court. This Court has inherent authority to ensure an honest and fair litigation that is free of the conduct Mr. Giguere has elected to exercise in this action.

Mr. Giguere’s conduct, unless stopped by this Court, sends a clear message to other witnesses/defendants that they are to not cooperate with Mr. Ray or the Court’s subpoena powers.

Ray has asked the court to strike Giguere’s filed defenses and award default judgment. $330 in service costs is also sought.